Marjorie Taylor Greene says Trump, GOP ‘governed America LAST,’ predicts midterm losses


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene predicted that the Republicans will lose control of the House of Representatives – and possibly the Senate – in the 2026 midterm elections, asserting that President Donald Trump and the GOP promised “America First” but delivered the opposite.

Greene, once a staunch Trump ally who has since become a vocal critic, declared in a Thursday post on X that “Americans are suffering,” “Both parties are absolute failures,” and that “the system needs to burn down.”

“Americans don’t give a d[—] about Trump building a WH ballroom or renovating the Kennedy Center as they are paying $4+ dollars per gallon for gas and nearly $6 for diesel because of another pointless foreign war. Americans are suffering. Suffering from all time high credit card debt. Suffering from ridiculously high cost of health insurance. Suffering from high cost of living. Suffering from ever increasing inflation and an ever decreasing dollar because of all the stupid decisions made by stupid politicians,” the former congresswoman wrote.

SPECIAL ELECTION REPLACING MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE GOES TO RUNOFF BETWEEN TRUMP-ENDORSED CANDIDATE AND DEMOCRAT

Marjorie Taylor Greene says Trump, GOP ‘governed America LAST,’ predicts midterm losses

Then-Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., arrives for a meeting of House Republicans in the Capitol Visitor Center on the budget reconciliation bill on Thursday, May 15, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

“Republicans are going to lose the House in the midterms and maybe the Senate too because Trump and Republicans sold America First but instead governed America LAST,” she continued. “Democrats put illegals and trans above Americans and offer no new policies to solve the problems they too created. Both parties are absolute failures.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment.

FORMER REP MTG ASSERTS THAT AMERICANS DON’T WANT US WAR AGAINST IRAN

trump speaks at cabinet meeting

President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House on March 26, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Greene departed office in the middle of her two-year term early this year after she and Trump had a falling out last year.

“Don’t lecture your voters that you have to vote for them when you have intentionally failed and betrayed your campaign promises just because the other side is intolerable. Screw you. You betray Americans, you put Americans last, you deserve to lose, you don’t deserve support,” she wrote in the post.

EX-TRUMP ALLY MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE RIPS THE PRESIDENT’S ENDORSEMENTS, SAYING THEY ‘SOLIDIFY THE SWAMP’

Marjorie Taylor Greene

Then-Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., speaks during a news conference with 10 of the alleged victims of disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein outside the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 3, 2025 in Washington, D.C.  (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“Many Americans are learning to live without the system and want nothing to do with any of it. Home schooling, farming and farmers markets, homesteading, networking among themselves is how many of us will survive beyond the insanity of the two parties. We’ve turned a corner and the system needs to burn down,” she concluded.


Emily Gregory projected to win Florida special election to represent Trump, Mar-a-Lago


President Donald Trump arrives at Palm Beach International Airport on October 31, 2025 in West Palm Beach, Florida. Trump is spending the weekend at his Mar-A-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.

Samuel Corum | Getty Images

Democratic candidate Emily Gregory is projected to win a special election on Tuesday evening for a Florida state House seat representing a Palm Beach County district whose residents include President Donald Trump.

Gregory’s projected victory over Jon Maples, the 43-year-old Republican endorsed by Trump, would flip the House District 87 seat from GOP control. The district includes Trump’s Palm Beach club, Mar-a-Lago, where he holds residency.

With more than 95% of the votes counted as of 9 p.m. ET, Gregory was leading Maples by 51.2% to 48.8%

Gregory’s expected win was immediately touted by Democrats as yet another warning sign to Republicans for the upcoming 2026 midterm elections.

Since Trump returned to the White House in January 2025, 29 seats in state legislatures around the country have been flipped from Republican control by Democratic candidates.

“If Democrats can win in Trump’s backyard, we sure as hell can win anywhere across the country. Onward to November!” Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin said in a post on the social media site X.

Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee President Heather Williams, in a statement, said, “Mar-a-Lago just flipped red to blue, which should have Republicans sweating the midterms.”

“A Trump +11 district in his own backyard shouldn’t be in play for Democrats, but tonight proves Republicans are vulnerable everywhere,” Williams said. “Gas prices are spiking, grocery costs are up, and families can’t get by – it’s clear voters at the polls are fed up with Republicans.”

“If Mar-a-Lago is vulnerable, imagine what’s possible this November,” she said. “Democrats are clearly on offense as we prepare for the most expansive midterm strategy ever down-ballot, with 650 seats in play. 2026 is shaping up to be an election for the history books.”

Gregory, a 40-year-old small business owner, had not sought elected office before this year. She is expected to seek election to a full two-year term in November.

The special election was held to fill the seat previously held by Mike Caruso, a Republican who resigned in August to become Palm Beach County clerk.

Caruso, who won District 87 in the 2024 election by nearly 20 percentage points, was appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, who had unsuccessfully sought the 2024 GOP presidential nomination, which was won by Trump.

Trump had praised Maples at an event in Florida on Saturday, calling the candidate up on stage.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

“I’m honored that the voters of District 87 have placed their trust in me,” Gregory said in a statement on Tuesday night.

“Tonight’s result sends a clear message that people want Florida to move in a new direction, one where leaders focus on lowering costs and standing up for working families,” Gregory said.

“Floridians are being squeezed by rising housing costs, insurance rates, and everyday expenses, and that’s what this campaign has always been about: making Florida more affordable and making sure our state works for the people who live here,” she said.

Maples’ campaign did not immediately reply to a request for comment by CNBC.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.


Ballot box upset: Democrats flip Florida legislative seat in Trump’s stomping ground


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Florida Democrats on Tuesday flipped control of a long-vacant Republican-held state House seat in a Palm Beach-anchored district that includes Mar-a-Lago, President Donald Trump’s home turf.

The Associated Press reports that Democrat Emily Gregory defeated Republican Jon Maples in a special election in Florida’s House District 87, in the race to fill the seat left vacant last August, when GOP state Rep. Mike Caruso resigned to become Palm Beach County clerk and comptroller.

The ballot box battle was one of three special legislative elections being held in GOP-dominated Florida on Tuesday. And while the contests won’t change the balance of power in the state legislature, where for more than a quarter-century Republicans have held majorities in both the House and Senate chambers, bragging rights were up for grabs in the president’s home district.

HEAD HERE FOR THE LATEST FOX NEWS REPORTING FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL

Ballot box upset: Democrats flip Florida legislative seat in Trump’s stomping ground

President Donald Trump is backing Republican Jon Maples in Tuesday’s special legislative election in Florida’s House District 87, which includes Mar-a-Lago, the president’s permanent residence in Palm Beach, Florida. (Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images; AP Photo/Steve Helber, File)

Maples was backed by Trump, who moved his primary permanent residence in 2019 from Trump Tower in New York City to Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida. He is also backed by a number of top Sunshine State Republicans.

“There is a very important Special Election tomorrow, Tuesday, March 24th, for Florida State House District 87 in beautiful Palm Beach County — JON MAPLES HAS MY COMPLETE AND TOTAL ENDORSEMENT!” the president wrote in a social media post on Monday evening.

The 43-year-old Maples, a financial planner and former Lake Clarke Shores Council member who, during his years at Palm Beach Atlantic University was an all-American athlete, made cutting taxes and government spending, reducing regulations, promoting private sector job creation and advancing school choice.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Gregory, a 40-year-old Army spouse, owns and runs a Jupiter-based fitness center for pregnant and postpartum women. The first-time candidate made affordability, increasing public education, tackling rising property insurance and housing costs, and access to healthcare key parts of her campaign.

Maples was the favorite heading into the special election, thanks to his fundraising advantage in a district that leads to the right. Trump carried the district by roughly 10 points in his 2024 re-election victory. Palm Beach County was once firmly blue until a GOP surge in recent cycles.


Denmark votes in an early election that follows a crisis over US designs on Greenland


COPENHAGEN, Denmark — Danish voters went to the polls Tuesday in a general election, with Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen seeking a third term at the helm of the Scandinavian country after a standoff with U.S. President Donald Trump over the future of the kingdom’s semiautonomous territory of Greenland.

More than 4.3 million people are eligible to have their say in the vote for the new Folketing, or parliament, in Copenhagen, which is elected for a four-year term.

Frederiksen called the election last month, going to the country several months before she had to in apparent hopes that her resolute image in the crisis over Greenland would help her with voters in the European Union and NATO member country.

In her second term, her support had waned as the cost of living rose — something that, along with pensions and a potential wealth tax, has been a prominent campaign issue.

The 48-year-old center-left Social Democrat is known for strong support of Ukraine in its defense against Russia’s invasion and for a restrictive approach to migration — continuing a tradition in Danish politics that now goes back two decades.

Seeking to counter pressure from the right and pointing to a possible surge in migration because of the Iran war, Frederiksen announced proposals this month that include a potential “emergency brake” on asylum and tighter controls on criminals who lack legal residence. Her government had already unveiled a plan to allow the deportation of foreigners who have been sentenced to at least one year in prison for serious crimes.

Two center-right challengers hope to oust Frederiksen as prime minister. One is in her current government — Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen of the Liberal, or Venstre, party, which headed several recent administrations.

The other is Alex Vanopslagh, 34, of the opposition Liberal Alliance, which calls for lower taxes and less bureaucracy, and for Denmark to abandon its refusal to use nuclear power. But a recent admission from Vanopslagh to taking cocaine earlier in his time as party leader may have dented his chances.

Further to the right, the anti-immigration Danish People’s Party looks well-placed to bounce back from a very weak showing at the last election in 2022.

No single party is expected to come anywhere near winning a majority. Denmark’s system of proportional representation typically produces coalition governments, traditionally made up of several parties from either the “red bloc” on the left or the “blue bloc” on the right, after weeks of negotiations.

Frederiksen’s outgoing three-party administration was the first in decades to straddle the political divide. It remains to be seen whether this election will result in a repeat, with the centrist Moderate party of Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen possibly acting as the kingmaker.

Greenland, which took up much of the government’s energy in recent months, hasn’t been a significant issue in the campaign because there is broad agreement on its place in the kingdom.

Frederiksen warned in January that an American takeover of Greenland would amount to the end of NATO. But the crisis has simmered down, at least for now.

After Trump backed down on threats to impose tariffs on Denmark and other European countries that opposed the U.S. taking control of the vast Arctic island, the U.S., Denmark and Greenland started technical talks on an Arctic security deal.

Denmark’s single-chamber parliament has 179 seats. Of those, 175 go to lawmakers from Denmark itself and two each for representatives from thinly populated Greenland and the kingdom’s other semiautonomous territory, the Faroe Islands.

___

Moulson reported from Berlin.


Democrat Emily Gregory wants to represent Trump — and his Mar-a-Lago resort — in Florida’s legislature


U.S. President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property in Palm Beach, Florida.

Marco Bello | Reuters

Emily Gregory, a small business owner and first-time candidate for elected office, is looking to score an upset in a Florida special election on Tuesday to represent Mar-a-Lago in the state legislature.

Gregory is a Democrat running for state House District 87, which runs up the coast of southeast Florida and includes Palm Beach — where President Donald Trump’s home and resort is located — as well as South Palm Beach and Juno Beach.

“It is the kind of district that fits just kind of outside the bubble of what we’ve seen Democratic over-performance in these targeted races,” Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, said in an interview with journalists from CNBC and MS Now. “We could win it. If we don’t win it it’s not going to be a surprise.”

Gregory is squaring off against Trump-endorsed candidate Jon Maples — a financial advisor and former college basketball player — in a district the GOP has controlled since 2022.

Republican Mike Caruso, who represented the area in the state House until his resignation in 2025, won reelection in 2024 by 19 points. But as Trump’s approval ratings dip and Democrats throughout the country are showing gains in special elections, Gregory and her supporters see an opportunity to play spoiler and potentially pick up a seat with major symbolic value.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

But according to Gregory, Trump is not the focal point.

“It’s impacted people’s interest in talking to me about it,” Gregory said in an interview. “He is a constituent. But I am more focused on all 115,000 voters in District 87, not just the one.”

But in the MAGA era, Trump cuts a large figure even in some state and local races, particularly ones where the president has a personal stake. In January, Trump endorsed Maples, who last year stepped away from his seat on the Lake Clarke Shores Town Council.

Maples did not respond to multiple phone calls to his financial advisory office. His campaign did not respond to multiple emailed requests for comment. The Republican Party of Florida did not respond to an emailed request for comment.

“As your next State Representative, Jon will fight tirelessly to Grow the Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Promote MADE IN THE U.S.A., Stop Migrant Crime, Safeguard our Elections, Support our Military, Veterans, and Law Enforcement, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment,” the president wrote in a post to Truth Social in January.

Trump became a Florida resident in 2019, during his first term as president.

Maples has branded himself a “conservative outsider. America First patriot.”

On his campaign website, Maples says he would focus on “congested roads, polluted waterways” and “affordability challenges, from inflation to soaring insurance premiums to ever-increasing property taxes.” After notching Trump’s endorsement, Maples called the president “the most transformative leader I’ve seen in my lifetime” in a social media post.

“The positive impacts of his presidency will be felt for generations — from the liberation of Venezuela, to the incredible trade deals he’s negotiating, to securing the Southern Border after 4 years of open border policies. America is better off with Donald J Trump in the White House,” Maples posted to Instagram.

Affordability as a state election issue

Gregory is eager to talk about affordability issues. She said she would be focused on addressing the state’s property insurance crisis and concerns about spiking health insurance costs with the expiration of Affordable Care Act tax subsidies earlier this year. She said the state legislature should expand Medicaid, stop gutting public education and focus more on kitchen table issues.

“The legislature is focused on attacking vulnerable communities and participating in culture wars and not solving the affordability crisis in the state,” Gregory said.

But Gregory has an uphill climb to win on Tuesday in a state where Republicans have a cash advantage and outnumber registered Democratic voters by more than a million. 

Gregory sees hopes in national trends of Democrats overperforming in special elections in the last year, including in ruby-red Florida.

Democrats outperformed 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris in nine special elections in Florida in 2025, in some cases by double digits, according to local outlet MCI Maps. And in December, Eileen Higgins became the first Democrat to win a mayoral race in Miami in nearly 30 years.

“We’ve knocked all of the doors, we’ve made all of the calls. I’m really proud of the campaign we ran. I think it’s going to be close, and I think we’re going to come out on the right side of it,” Gregory said.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.




Alito gives lawyers plain-English lesson on meaning of ‘day’ as Supreme Court weighs late-ballot fight


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Justice Samuel Alito emphasized the literal meaning of the word “day” as the Supreme Court heard arguments Monday about whether states can legally accept late-arriving ballots that are postmarked by Election Day.

“We have lots of phrases that involve two words, the last of which, the second of which is ‘day,’ Labor Day, Memorial Day, George Washington’s birthday, Independence Day, birthday and Election Day, and they’re all particular days,” Alito, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, said.

Alito added, “If we start with that, if I have nothing more to look at than the phrase ‘Election Day,’ I think this is the day in which everything is going to take place, or almost everything.”

The justice’s remarks came after the Republican National Committee sued over a Mississippi law that allows mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they are received five days after that day. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit sided with the RNC in the case in 2024, leading Mississippi to ask the Supreme Court to weigh in.

ELECTION INTEGRITY GROUPS PRESS SUPREME COURT TO REQUIRE BALLOTS BY ELECTION DAY

Alito gives lawyers plain-English lesson on meaning of ‘day’ as Supreme Court weighs late-ballot fight

U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito on Oct. 7, 2022, in Washington, D.C. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Alito was among multiple conservative justices on Monday who appeared skeptical of Mississippi’s law and intent on striking it down. A decision is expected by the summer and would likely affect more than a dozen states that accept postmarked ballots after Election Day.

While some of the justices seemed persuaded that Election Day should be viewed as a single and final day in an election cycle, Chief Justice John Roberts, a George W. Bush appointee, and Justice Elena Kagan, an Obama appointee, raised concerns that if the interpretation of Election Day was strictly upheld by the court, then early voting might also be affected.

“If ‘day’ includes a period after a particular day of the election, does it include a particular day before the day of the election?” Roberts asked Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart. “Or does your logic require a different consideration?”

Former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, a prominent conservative lawyer, argued in support of the RNC, saying the original meaning of an election involved the “combined action” of offering up a vote and an election official receiving the vote.

RNC GETS DAY AT SUPREME COURT TO CHALLENGE LATE-ARRIVING MAIL BALLOTS

Supreme Court building in Washington, DC

The facade of the U.S. Supreme Court building is seen in October 2024. (Valerie Plesch/picture alliance via Getty Images)

“All agree that elections for federal office have to end on the day of the election specified by Congress, and all agree that you can’t have an election unless you receive ballots, and there must be some deadline for ballot receipt,” Clement said. “Nonetheless, Mississippi insists that ballots can trickle in days or even weeks after Election Day. That position is wrong as a matter of text, precedent, history and common sense.”

The case comes as President Donald Trump has made election security a top focus. The RNC and several election integrity groups that weighed in on the case argued that the Supreme Court should ban late-arriving ballots, except for military ballots, because they sow distrust in elections.

“Today’s oral arguments in Watson v. RNC clearly show where the Supreme Court should come down: state laws that count ballots received after Election Day violate federal law, expose elections to delays, invite fraud, and fuel public doubt in the democratic process,” Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital.

Pennsylvania Elections Mail Ballots

Allegheny County workers scan mail-in and absentee ballots at the Allegheny County Election Division Elections warehouse in Pittsburgh, Thursday, Nov. 3, 2022. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

At least 14 states and Washington, D.C., currently count ballots received after Election Day if postmarked on time.

A ruling upholding the 5th Circuit could invalidate those policies and require ballots to be in election officials’ hands by the close of polls, a decision that is expected to affect the 2026 midterms. Critics say election officials could still be counting mail ballots in some states even if the ballots are all received by Election Day because of states’ individual tabulating processes.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Military and overseas ballots, which are governed by the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, would likely remain unaffected.

Since the 2024 midterm elections, four Republican-controlled states, Kansas, Ohio, Utah and North Dakota, have moved to require receipt by Election Day.

Fox News’ Bill Mears contributed to this report.


Iran war-induced fertilizer shortage threatens Republicans in farm states ahead of midterms


Garrett Mauch spreads manure as fertilizer on fields at his family’s farm in Lamar, Colorado, on January 21, 2026.

RJ Sangosti | The Denver Post Via Getty Images | Denver Post | Getty Images

The Strait of Hormuz shutdown caused by the war in Iran is jacking up fertilizer prices, hitting farmers in their pocketbooks and threatening to raise food prices.

Now, Democrats trying to win the U.S. midterm elections in November see another new opportunity to pound the affordability crisis and turn the tide after years of losses in the states that produce crops and livestock.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical channel for fertilizer, including about 50% of global nitrogen-rich urea fertilizers, according to the Fertilizer Institute, the industry’s trade association. The strait has been effectively impassable since President Donald Trump launched the assault, which is now in its third week with no end in sight.

The closure has spiked fertilizer prices just before planting season, potentially scrambling decision-making for farmers across the U.S. And it comes on top of already low commodity prices that have lingered for years and eaten into farmers’ margins.

“We’re in uncharted territory,” Matt Frostic, a Michigan farmer who sits on the board of the National Corn Growers Association, said in an interview with CNBC. “It’s like a code red.”

Frostic said he purchased nitrogen fertilizer, critical for corn crops, in January for around $350 per ton. That same product, he said, is now closing in on $600 per ton.

The murky farm outlook also comes eight months before the midterm elections that could cost Trump control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Democrats, who are trying to win competitive seats in farm-heavy states such as Iowa, Minnesota and Nebraska, are jumping on the high fertilizer prices as a new example of the affordability issue that continues to haunt Trump and Republicans.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

“There are tons of people just like me in our district who are like, I don’t get it. I don’t understand. It was already hard, and now they’re making it harder, and nobody knows why,” said Jake Johnson, a public school teacher who is running for Congress in Minnesota’s first District against incumbent Republican Rep. Brad Finstad.

“Our number one job as a campaign and what we want to talk about to every single person we talk to is we need ways to make things cheaper,” Johnson said.

The rural entreaties from Democrats come after years of bleeding support in the country’s rural, agrarian states in the middle of the country. Trump in 2024 won nearly every state in the Midwest, with exceptions in Minnesota and Illinois. He also dominated the county-by-county contest, according to the Center for Politics, winning 2,660 counties compared with former Vice President Kamala Harris’ 451, which were centered in the most populated parts of the U.S.

Democrats want to win rural America

Turning the tide in rural America has been a longtime goal for Democrats, but has often proved elusive. In Iowa in 2018, Democrats won 3 out of the 4 congressional seats in the state. Now, Republicans control all four. But with Trump’s economic approval plummeting and Democrats leading in the generic ballot, Democrats have high hopes this year.

Johnson said farmers in particular are recoiling from Trump’s tariff campaign, which saw his White House authorize a roughly $12 billion bailout last year. The war now adds a new inflationary wrinkle.

“A vote for me is a vote to end tariffs, and it’s a vote to end the war,” he said. “We do have to start by undoing the obvious damage that the status quo has foisted upon us.”

Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump takes the stage during his Iowa caucus night watch party in Des Moines, Iowa, U.S., January 15, 2024.

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Finding a fertilizer price solution

Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., the Senate Agriculture Committee chair, said he’s working with the administration to quickly find a solution to the fertilizer issue.

“The good news is everybody understands what a problem this is for our farmers,” Boozman said in an interview. “Because of that, everything’s on the table. We’re looking at all the options that are available, and hopefully we’ll decide on a plan soon.”

Boozman did not detail what those plans would be. His counterpart in the House, Rep. G.T. Thompson, R-Ark., said Trump is “aggressively” trying to work on getting the Strait of Hormuz back open.

Thompson noted Trump’s efforts to court “other countries in order to make those transport ships and tankers be able to pass safely during that narrow strip.”

He also said any tariffs on fertilizer should be removed ahead of planting season.

“We really shouldn’t have tariffs on fertilizer or any of the components,” he said.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Fox Business Thursday said Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins “will likely be making an announcement on fertilizer in the next few days.”

Bessent noted the Trump tariffs largely exempt nitrogen-based fertilizer, which is critical to growing corn.

But opening the strait to allow fertilizer to flow is a tall order for the administration, despite efforts to free trapped cargo ships. And the risks for U.S. farmers and food consumers continue to rise.

“Without strategically prioritizing the delivery of critical farm inputs such as urea, ammonia, nitrogen, phosphate, and sulfur-based products, the U.S. risks a shortfall in crops,” American Farm Bureau Federation President Zippy Duvall said in a recent letter to Trump. “Not only is this a threat to our food security — and by extension our national security — such a production shock could contribute to inflationary pressures across the U.S. economy.”

Agriculture price shocks similar to 2022

Joe Glauber, a former chief economist at the Agriculture Department under the Obama administration and a research fellow emeritus at the International Food Policy Research Institute, said the shock is similar to when Russia invaded Ukraine — but noted that the accompanying commodity price spikes are now missing.

“We hit record levels in 2022,” Glauber said. “But the other thing that was really high in 2022 were grain prices, and so farmers, even though they were paying really high fertilizer costs, they were able to more or less get by because they were getting good returns from what they were selling.”

Glauber said farmers are right to be worried if they’re only considering their balance sheet — what they grow and what they sell. But he noted the influx in government payments to farmers, like the one being considered now in Congress, has been huge in recent years.

“It’s a different story if you include government payments,” Glauber said. “And there’s just been a ton of government payments.”

Frostic, the Michigan farmer, said he’s aiming for Congress to pass a “consumer choice” bill that would allow drivers to buy ethanol gasoline, known as E15, year-round. Ethanol is typically priced cheaper than regular gasoline, and the bill would potentially lift commodity prices by giving farmers a new market to sell into.

And Frostic, while saying he was grateful for government payments, said the bailout may fall short and that he’d rather make money by selling his crop.

“I would rather sell my products and make money than have the government write me a check to make me whole,” he said. “It distorts the market too much, it can kind of pick winners and losers, and typically when we get checks like that, it’s a pass-through.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.


Sen. Cornyn: Why the SAVE Act matters more than the filibuster



If a man takes a swing at you and barely misses, that doesn’t make him a pacifist — it just means he has bad aim.

Standing still and giving him a second free swing wouldn’t be wise or honorable; it would be foolish.

In 2022, Chuck Schumer and 47 other Senate Democrats tried to change the rules of the US Senate and “nuke” the filibuster to ram through a left-wing takeover of election laws.

They were just barely stopped by two holdout Democrats who were promptly driven out of their party and into retirement.

In 2024, Schumer confirmed to reporters that Democrats mean to finish the job and kill the filibuster’s 60-vote threshold the next time they take the majority. 

For many years, I believed that if the US Senate scrapped the filibuster, Texas and our nation would stand to lose more than we would gain.

My fellow conservatives and I have proudly used the 60-vote threshold to protect the country from all sorts of bad ideas and dangerous policies.

But when the reality on the ground changes, leaders must take stock and adapt.

Today, Democrats are weaponizing the Senate’s rules to block the SAVE America Act, defund the Department of Homeland Security and hurt the American people — all to spite President Donald Trump.

But they say openly that if these same rules ever get in Democrats’ way, they won’t hesitate to rip them up.

A rule is only a rule if both sides follow it.

I believe that Democrats, with their votes and statements, have already dealt the filibuster a fatal blow: The Senate rules will change eventually, whether Republicans like it or not.

This leaves conservatives with two options.

We can either unilaterally disarm, or we can stand and fight.

We can let the Democrats keep obstructing today and then smash the rules the first chance they get, or we can act now and use the mandate the American people gave this president and this Congress to secure our elections, protect our homeland and bring back common sense.

The answer is clear: We need to stand, fight and win.

Democrats started this fight. Now Republicans should finish it. 

When 48 Democrats nearly killed the filibuster, it was to pass radical legislation designed to increase election fraud.

They tried to ban voter ID requirements, to decriminalize ballot harvesting, and even to send taxpayer dollars into Democrats’ own campaign funds.

The SAVE America Act, which I’ve cosponsored, would do the opposite.

It would make it easy to vote but harder to cheat, by requiring proof of citizenship and voter ID.

These basic, commonsense protections are massively popular with the American people — and the fact that the radical left apparently sees them as such a threat to their chances in November truly gives their game away.

The president has made the SAVE America Act his “number one priority,” and he is right.

But it’s also urgent to overcome other aspects of the far left’s obstruction.

Americans are being forced to wait in line for three hours at airport security checkpoints because the Democrats are blocking funding for homeland security and immigration law enforcement.

Bad enough that Democrats’ political tantrum is ruining travelers’ days — but at this time of hostilities with Iran, their financial siege of DHS is not just inconvenient, it’s dangerous. 

Texans don’t need more endless discussions over Washington rules that Democrats have already promised to break. Talk is cheap.

They need leaders who get results.

And results are exactly what I have been proud to help President Trump deliver during both of his terms.

I’ve partnered with the president to cut taxes for working families, rebuild our military, stop inflation, transform the courts and secure our border.

Now this success story needs its next chapter.

After careful consideration, I support whatever changes to Senate rules that may prove necessary for us to get the SAVE America Act and homeland security funding past the Democrats’ obstruction, through the Senate, and on the president’s desk for his signature.

This could be a “talking filibuster” that removes the obstructionists’ free pass and makes them defend their indefensible views on the Senate floor, or it could be a different reform.

Process matters, but outcomes matter more: The Democrats’ assault on election integrity and national security must be stopped.

Leadership means upholding core principles and applying them thoughtfully as circumstances change.

I spent years defending the filibuster because the 60-vote threshold was a net benefit to Texas and our nation.

Before moderate Democrats went extinct, the rules worked.

But as President Abraham Lincoln once warned Congress, “the dogmas of the quiet past” can become “inadequate to the stormy present.”

The Democrats’ recklessness and radicalism have changed the landscape.

On these critical issues, at this critical hour, the old procedures no longer align with the core American principles we must defend.

It is time for our Senate Republican Conference, led by our strong and strategic Majority Leader John Thune, to retake the initiative, rebuild momentum and get results.

I respectfully urge the remaining handful of my Republican colleagues still holding on to the old position that I used to share to reassess the new reality and update their thinking.

We should use the authority the voters have entrusted in us to pass the SAVE America Act, fund homeland security, and bring the far left’s obstruction to an end.

John Cornyn represents Texas in the US Senate.


Trump vows legislative blockade until SAVE America voter-ID bill is passed


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a round table on collegiate sports in the White House in Washington, D.C., March 6, 2026.

Nathan Howard | Reuters

President Donald Trump threatened to withhold his signature from any bill that reaches his desk until Congress passes a controversial election measure known as the SAVE America Act, which would make it much harder for many Americans to vote.

“It must be done immediately. It supersedes everything else. MUST GO TO THE FRONT OF THE LINE,” Trump said in a Truth Social post on Sunday. “I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed.”

The SAVE America Act would require proof of citizenship and photo ID to vote. The measure has been the subject of an immense pressure campaign from right-wing commentators and congressional Republicans.

The House passed the bill last month, but it is short of the 60-vote filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. Republicans hold a 53-47 vote majority in the upper chamber, and Democrats have vowed to oppose it. That has led some Republicans to call for subverting the filibuster, which Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D, has so far resisted.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the threat of gridlock does not change Democrats’ stance.

“If Trump is saying he won’t sign any bills until the SAVE Act is passed, then so be it: there will be total gridlock in the Senate,” he said on X. “Senate Democrats will not help pass the SAVE Act under any circumstances.”

Trump has also called for Congress to deliver him an enhanced version of the bill, “NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION,” he wrote.

“GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY – ILLNESS, DISABILITY, TRAVEL: NO MEN IN WOMEN’S SPORTS: NO TRANSGENDER MUTILIZATION FOR CHILDREN! DO NOT FAIL!!!” Trump added.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

Trump’s demands would require the House to pass another iteration of the SAVE America Act — it has already passed two versions of the measure during this Congress. That’s anything but assured when Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., only has what is effectively a one-vote majority in the House.

Trump’s threatened signature blockade also imperils other must-pass legislation, like a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security for the remainder of the fiscal year. The department is currently shut down after funding lapsed last month. Democrats are demanding new restrictions on Trump’s deportation efforts after two American citizens were shot and killed by federal immigration agents.

A signature blockade may have mixed results. Trump can veto any bills sent to him and send them back to Congress, which can override his veto with a two-thirds majority in each chamber. If Congress adjourns, the president also can let the bill sit for 10 days, and it will not become law — a procedure known as a “pocket veto.”

But an unsigned bill that sits for 10 days while Congress is in session automatically becomes law, meaning Congress could overcome a signature blockade by staying in session.

The clock is also ticking for Republicans facing a tough midterm election in November, which could potentially see Democrats winning back the majority in one or both chambers. The window for pushing through any of the GOP’s or Trump’s legislative wish list is already narrow, and polls indicate that voters are souring on Trump and his economy ahead of the elections.

An NBC News poll released Sunday found that 62% of voters disapprove of Trump’s handling of inflation and the cost of living — the top issues for voters in that poll. Democrats held a six-point lead in the generic congressional ballot in the survey.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.


Iran war threatens to scramble the ‘affordability’ midterm


U.S. President Donald Trump points his finger as he arrives to deliver remarks on the U.S. economy and affordability at the Mount Airy Casino Resort in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, U.S. December 9, 2025.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

November’s midterm was always supposed to be about affordability. Then, the bombs began falling in Iran.

The expanding U.S. war in the Middle East threatens to scramble the cost-of-living narrative that has so far defined the contest for control of Congress. The election, now less than eight months away, will determine whether President Donald Trump retains his iron grip on Washington or spends his last two years in office fending off Democratic congressional majorities.

Both parties have sought to capitalize on kitchen-table issues, as Americans struggle to keep up with the rising costs of ordinary goods and services. The war in Iran now threatens to exacerbate those concerns — and Democrats are seizing on the opportunity to pillory Trump and Republicans for beginning a conflict that could make life even more expensive for ordinary Americans.

“Because there was no plan going in, I think there will be lots of things that are unforeseen consequences of this,” Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M, the top Democrat on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said in an interview with CNBC. “I mean you saw how much gas has gone up in a day, oil futures have gone up, there are going to be a lot of knock-on effects.”

Read more CNBC politics coverage

Some of those knock-on effects have already been evident. U.S. crude oil has jumped past $90 per barrel, up from $67 the day before the war broke out. The global market index Brent has skyrocketed to more than $90 per barrel. That’s caused gas prices to spike to about $3.38 per gallon, according to a national average from Gasbuddy, up more than 35 cents from the week before the war.

Rep. Jared Huffman, D-Calif., the ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee, was quick to point out in an interview that liquefied natural gas prices have also spiked. Though U.S. increases have been modest so far, global LNG supply has been squeezed by a shutdown in Qatar — one of the world’s top LNG-producing countries. Natural gas is the largest electricity generator in the U.S., which is critical as the booming data center industry stresses the electric grid and increases utility costs.

“I think what American families have been feeling most acutely for the past year-plus is their energy bills, their utility bills rising,” Huffman said. “A big part of the utility bill increase is that natural gas is getting more and more expensive … a lot of our effort has been pushed into LNG exports instead of strategies that would lower bills for American consumers. That problem is only more amplified by this conflict.”

Wrapping up the Iran war

Some Republicans are banking on the conflict in Iran wrapping up quickly to mitigate economic damage. Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., a member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said taming energy prices will depend on the U.S. destroying Iran’s ballistic missiles, drones and nuclear capacity.

“Once we’ve done that, I think you’ll see oil prices start back down because you won’t have that interruption in the Arabian Gulf,” Hoeven said. “But the real key is that we achieve our objectives and then you have oil continue to come out of the Gulf.”

“I’m talking relatively shorter term, I’m talking weeks, not months, and I think that’s going to be the key in terms of oil prices,” he said.

But a quick operation in Iran is far from certain, and any extended conflict could create an election-year quagmire for Republicans, said Brittany Martinez, executive director at Principles First and a former aide to then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

“If energy prices rise or markets stay volatile, affordability becomes a harder message for Republicans to carry cleanly,” Martinez said. “Republicans will argue that projecting strength abroad prevents greater instability, while Democrats will try to link any sustained price increases to foreign policy decisions. The real question is whether this turns into a prolonged conflict that voters feel in their household budgets.”

Many believe the military intervention in Iran has the potential to drag on, including Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J., a national security advisor in the Obama White House.

“This administration doesn’t seem to think about this at all,” Kim said when asked about a potential power vacuum keeping the U.S. in the region longer. “The intelligence community has done a whole range of assessments that very much keep me up at night, and the fact that this White House, I assume, read the same things I read and still went through with this, I just find that to be absolutely reckless.”

Iran offensive unpopular with voters

Complicating matters more for the GOP is that the war in Iran is unpopular. A CNN poll released March 2 found that nearly 60% of those surveyed disapproved of the U.S. taking military action in Iran. That comes as Trump’s economic approval remains underwater: A Fox News poll released March 4 found that 61% of voters disapproved of Trump’s job on the economy.

“We don’t see it as an opportunity, but I do think it’s our responsibility to tell the American people exactly the decision that Donald Trump is making,” said House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, D-Calif. “He’s sending billions of our tax dollars to the Middle East for another war while he’s kicking people off of healthcare and … eliminating nutrition programs.”

Rep. Zach Nunn, an Iowa Republican seeking reelection in a district Cook Political Report with Amy Walter has labeled a “toss up,” said he is not concerned the war could drown out the GOP’s affordability message. He pointed to the sprawling tax and spending bill that was signed into law last year, increased domestic energy production, and housing legislation that advanced out of the House last month as examples of things the party will use to show action on rising costs.

War in the Middle East does not necessarily preclude Republicans from continuing to try to bring prices down, he argued.

“A more fulsome conversation would be, how do we make sure that we still deliver on affordability?” Nunn said in an interview. “I think this is the absolute right spot for us to be in.”

America First

But Trump, the “America First” president who campaigned on ending the U.S.’s foreign entanglements, risks alienating his base with his Iran offensive. Democrats see the war as evidence of what they have been telling voters about Trump all along: he does not care affordability.

“We have a president who has campaigned on ending forever wars, and he has jumped into war without justification or explanation to the American people,” said Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. “So this has been broken promise after broken promise. This has been at the expense of the needs of everyday Americans. And I do think voters will hold them accountable in November.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.