A federal judge in San Francisco granted Anthropic’s request for a preliminary injunction in its lawsuit against the Trump administration. 

Judge Rita Lin issued the ruling on Thursday, two days after lawyers for the artificial intelligence startup and the U.S. government appeared in court for a hearing. Anthropic sued the administration to try to reverse its blacklisting by the Pentagon and President Donald Trump’s directive banning federal agencies from using its Claude models.

Anthropic sought the injunction to pause those actions and prevent further monetary and reputational harm as the case unfolds. The order bars the Trump administration from implementing, applying or enforcing the president’s directive, and hampers the Pentagon’s efforts to designate Anthropic as a threat to U.S. national security. 

“Punishing Anthropic for bringing public scrutiny to the government’s contracting position is classic illegal First Amendment retaliation,” Lin wrote in the order. A final verdict in the case could still be months away. 

During Tuesday’s hearing, Lin pressed the government’s lawyers about why Anthropic was blacklisted. Her language in Thursday’s order was even sharper.

“Nothing in the governing statute supports the Orwellian notion that an American company may be branded a potential adversary and saboteur of the U.S. for expressing disagreement with the government,” she wrote.

Following the ruling, Anthropic said it’s “grateful to the court for moving swiftly.”

“While this case was necessary to protect Anthropic, our customers, and our partners, our focus remains on working productively with the government to ensure all Americans benefit from safe, reliable AI,” the company said in a statement.  

Anthropic’s suit earlier this month followed a dramatic couple weeks in Washington D.C., between the Department of Defense and one of the most valuable private companies in the world.

In a post on X in late February, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared Anthropic a so-called supply chain risk, meaning that use of the company’s technology purportedly threatens U.S. national security. In early March, the DOD officially notified Anthropic about the designation via a letter.

Anthropic is the first American company to publicly be named a supply chain risk, as the designation has historically been reserved for foreign adversaries. The label requires Defense contractors, including Amazon, Microsoft, and Palantir, to certify that they do not use Claude in their work with the military. 

The Trump administration relied on two distinct designations – 10 U.S.C. § 3252 and 41 U.S.C. § 4713 – to justify the action, and they have to be challenged in two separate courts. Because of that, Anthropic has filed another lawsuit for a formal review of the Defense Department’s determination in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington. 

Shortly before Hegseth declared Anthropic a supply chain risk, President Donald Trump wrote a Truth Social post ordering federal agencies to “immediately cease” all use of Anthropic’s technology. He said there would be a six-month phase-out period for agencies like the DOD.

“WE will decide the fate of our Country — NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left AI company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about,” Trump wrote.

The Trump administration’s actions surprised many officials in Washington who had come to admire and rely on Anthropic’s technology. The company was the first to deploy its models across the DOD’s classified networks, and it was championed for its ability to integrate with existing Defense contractors like Palantir. 

Anthropic signed a $200 million contract with the Pentagon in July, but as the company began negotiating Claude’s deployment on the DOD’s GenAI.mil AI platform in September, talks stalled.

The DOD wanted Anthropic to grant the Pentagon unfettered access to its models across all lawful purposes, while Anthropic wanted assurance that its technology would not be used for fully autonomous weapons or domestic mass surveillance. 

The two failed to reach an agreement, and now, the dispute will be settled in court. 

“Everyone, including Anthropic, agrees that the Department of [Defense] is free to stop using Claude and look for a more permissive AI vendor,” Lin said during the hearing Tuesday. “I don’t see that as being what this case is about. I see the question in this case as being a very different one, which is whether the government violated the law.

WATCH: Anthropic vs. Pentagon hearing

Thursday’s Opening Day may be the calm before the storm for Major League Baseball.

The league’s collective bargaining agreement with its players expires at the end of this season. Owners, with the commissioner’s backing, are almost sure to push for a salary cap (which would likely come with a salary floor to get players to the negotiating table).

MLB owners have never been able to get a cap passed by the players union. It’s unclear if the end of the 2026 season will lead to a different result, but MLB Players Association Interim Executive Director Bruce Meyer told ESPN last month he expects a lockout is “all but guaranteed.”

In addition to the CBA’s expiration, there are major shifts underway for baseball media rights. One-third of the league’s teams didn’t have local TV deals in place for this season until this week. 

Nine MLB teams – the Washington Nationals, Seattle Mariners, Milwaukee Brewers, St. Louis Cardinals, Miami Marlins, Tampa Bay Rays, Cincinnati Reds, Kansas City Royals, and Detroit Tigers – announced Wednesday their brand new MLB-operated team channels will be carried by DirecTV.

Most of those teams had previously been part of Main Street Sports (previously Diamond Sports Group), which operates FanDuel Sports Networks (previously Bally Sports). That entity has been teetering with liquidation, and the teams terminated their contracts with the company due to missed payments earlier this year.

A 10th team, the Atlanta Braves, is launching a new network called BravesVision. The Braves and Charter’s Spectrum announced a multiyear distribution agreement earlier this week. 

MLB ideally wants the rights to all 30 teams in its control by the end of the 2028 season so that it can sell the in-market local games as a national package to a streamer. That would become the modern replacement to regional sports networks, and it would likely be a new, coveted package for streaming services such as ESPN and Amazon Prime Video.

Also at the end of the 2028 season, MLB’s national media rights for all of its packages will expire, allowing the league to redistribute games to its partners and potentially select new ones. 

NBC, ESPN, Fox and a combined CBS/Turner have dominated national rights for the past few decades.

“The key in media negotiations now is having all of your rights available,” MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred told me last year. “If you have all of your content – all of your playoffs, all of your regular season – available, there will be buyers, and I’m confident there will be buyers at a higher price for us.”

Manfred has even floated the idea of expanding to 32 teams and realigning the league geographically, upending or even eliminating the American and National leagues that have existed for more than 100 years. 

And yet, baseball isn’t struggling — on the contrary. The implementation of the pitch clock in 2023 has led to shorter games, rising attendance and higher TV ratings. 

More than 50 million people in the U.S., Canada and Japan watched Game Seven of the World Series last year – the most-watched baseball game in 34 years. MLB recently wrapped up the World Baseball Classic – a global preseason tournament – which captured nearly 11 million viewers on Fox and Fox Deportes for its final game.

MLB team valuations rose 13% from last year. The average MLB team is now worth $2.95 billion, according to CNBC Sport data.

Still, the profitability of the league is in far worse shape than it is for the NFL, NBA and NHL, according to CNBC’s calculations. In 2025, MLB’s 30 teams had an EBITDA — earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization — margin of under 2%. Team average revenue was $426 million with average EBITDA of $7 million, including non-MLB ballpark events. In contrast, the comparable margin for the NFL was 20%; the NBA, 21% and the NHL, 22%, according to CNBC’s most recent valuations.

The new CBA at the end of this season could be the first significant step toward a very different MLB. But, similar to the WNBA, which announced its new CBA earlier this week, MLB must ensure negotiations to get a new labor agreement don’t jeopardize a wave of positive momentum.

The White House hosted its “first humanoid robot guest” on Wednesday, with first lady Melania Trump appearing alongside a robot from robotics upstart Figure AI.

The robot, identified as Figure 3, accompanied the first lady during the second day of the Fostering the Future Together Global Coalition Summit, a gathering focused on technology and children’s education. 

The machine greeted attendees in multiple languages and described itself as “a humanoid built in the United States of America,” according to widely circulated footage from the event.

The display represented one of, if not the, highest-profile showcases of humanoid robotics in the U.S. to date and highlights how the tech is becoming a national priority amid global tech competition. Beijing has also promoted humanoid robots at highly publicized events this year.

The first lady used the robot to promote her push for artificial intelligence in children’s education, suggesting that the robots could one day act as interactive educators at home. However, Figure AI says its third-generation humanoids are also applicable for more general purposes, including commercial and household tasks. 

The White House spotlight is likely to boost the brand of Nvidia-backed Figure AI, a lesser-known robot company compared to larger humanoid players like Tesla‘s Optimus and Boston Dynamics, though some of its team comes from those competitors, as well as tech giants like Apple.

Figure AI was founded in 2022 by Brett Adcock, a tech entrepreneur and billionaire who previously co-founded the publicly traded drone company Archer Aviation and a digital hiring marketplace Vettery. 

Powering its robots is the firm’s in-house Helix AI system, a vision-language-action model that powers its robots and enables learning through observation and verbal commands.

Amid growing investor excitement for physical AI, the firm raised more than $1 billion in its Series C funding round in September led by Parkway Venture Capital with participation from other notable investors such as Nvidia, Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures and Salesforce. That gave it a post-money valuation of $39 billion. 

The fundraising is expected to be put towards the firm’s aim to deploy thousands of robots in homes and logistics over the coming years — a goal that has likely been made easier by a major endorsement from the White House. 

Figure AI has already begun work with its first commercial customer in BMW, deploying its robots for tasks like handling sheet metal parts in manufacturing facilities.

It’s possible that Melania’s endorsement of Figure AI’s robots as potential educators will trigger a reexamination of an ongoing lawsuit the company found itself in last year. 

In November, Figure AI was sued by its former head of product safety, who alleged he was fired after warning executives that the company’s robots were powerful enough to fracture a human skull.

Gruendel also alleged that one robot had carved a gash into a steel refrigerator door during a malfunction. Figure AI contends that Gruendel had been fired for poor performance, and described the allegations as “falsehoods.” Figure AI countersued in January, saying Gruendel failed in his role to help the company build a safe robot.

The lawsuit drew attention to broader questions about safety standards in humanoid robotics development and remains pending. 

Interestingly, the White House event on Wednesday wasn’t the first time that a company connected to Adcock received some major shine from the Trump administration. 

Shares of the drone company he co-founded, Archer Aviation, surged in June last year after U.S. President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order directing the establishment of a program to promote the safe integration of electric air taxis in U.S. cities.

Archer is participating in the initiative and is working on projects involving aircraft demonstrations. Following the June 2025 executive order, Archer raised $850 million in a registered direct stock offering. 

He remains a shareholder, according to investment research platform Business Quant, but he has no active executive, board, or advisory position at the company. 

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin said Tuesday that the decision by the Pentagon to blacklist Anthropic’s Claude artificial intelligence models “looks like an attempt to cripple” the company.

Anthropic appeared in San Francisco federal court on Tuesday to ask Lin to temporarily pause the Pentagon’s blacklisting and President Donald Trump’s directive banning federal government agencies from using that technology.

If the preliminary injunction is awarded, the AI startup will be able to continue doing business with government contractors and federal agencies as its lawsuit against the Trump administration plays out in court.

Without the injunction, the company has said, it could lose billions of dollars in business.

Earlier in March, the Department of Defense designated Anthropic a so-called supply chain risk, meaning that use of the company’s technology purportedly threatens U.S. national security. It was the first time an American company had been hit with that designation.

The label, if allowed to continue, will require defense contractors, including Amazon, Microsoft, and Palantir, to certify that they do not use Claude in their work with the military.

“This is something that has never been done with respect to American company,” Anthropic’s counsel Michael Mongan said during the hearing. “It is a very narrow authority. It doesn’t apply here, and it’s not a normal way to respond to the concerns that have been articulated by the other side.”

Palantir is continuing to use Claude in its work with the department as the legal battle plays out, CEO Alex Karp told CNBC on March 12. Anthropic’s model is also being used in the war with Iran.

Anthropic has argued that there is no basis to consider the company a supply chain risk. The company also said it is being unfairly retaliated against because it demanded that the DOD not use Claude for fully autonomous weapons or mass surveillance of Americans. The Pentagon insists it does not use the AI models for such purposes.

Lin said she expects to issue an order on Anthropic’s motion in the next few days.

On Monday, the judge gave lawyers for Anthropic and the government a list of questions she wants answered at the hearing.

One of those questions was: “What evidence in the record shows that Anthropic had ongoing access to or control over Claude after delivering it to the government, such that Anthropic could engage in acts of sabotage or subversion?”

In its motion seeking a preliminary injunction, Anthropic argued that such an order would prevent the company from incurring further economic and reputational harm.

“The government has infringed on Anthropic’s right to speak freely; it has disparaged the company’s good name by stigmatizing it with an unlawful designation as a national security risk; it has deprived Anthropic of government contracts and damaged its relationships with business partners in the private sector; and it has put millions, possibly billions, of dollars at risk,” the motion stated. “Absent immediate relief from this Court, those harms will continue to mount.”

The company also noted that an injunction would not require the U.S. government to use its models or prevent it from transitioning to another AI vendor. 

Before the conflict erupted in late February, Anthropic was one of the first AI companies to partner with many U.S. agencies as the government sought to rapidly upgrade its systems and capabilities with cutting-edge AI tech.

Anthropic signed a $200 million contract with the Pentagon in July and was the first AI lab to deploy its technology across the agency’s classified networks.

But as the company began negotiating Claude’s deployment on the DOD’s GenAI.mil AI platform in September, talks stalled over how the military could use the models.

The department has insisted on unfettered access to the company’s technology for all lawful purposes. 

During the hearing on Tuesday, Lin questioned if the DOD was punishing Anthropic for “acting stubbornly” in negotiations. The government’s lawyer Eric Hamilton said that the company was going beyond the normal scope of a contractor.

“Anthropic is not just acting stubbornly. It’s not just refusing to agree to contracting terms. Instead, it’s raising concerns to [DOD] about how [DOD] uses its technology in military missions,” Hamilton said. “What happens if anthropic installs a kill switch or functionality that changes how it functions? That is an unacceptable risk to [DOD].”

In February after Anthropic and the DOD failed to reach an agreement, Trump issued a Truth Social post ordering federal agencies to “immediately cease” all use of Anthropic’s technology.

“WE will decide the fate of our Country — NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left AI company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about,” Trump wrote.

WATCH: Anthropic sues Trump administration over Pentagon blacklisting

Amazon Web Services said it was once again facing service disruptions in Bahrain on Monday, as a result of the ongoing conflict ‌in the Middle East.

“We are working closely with local authorities and prioritizing the safety of our personnel throughout our recovery efforts,” a spokesperson said in a statement shared with CNBC. 

AWS advised customers to migrate their applications to alternate AWS Regions, and said it had already helped a large number of users to do so. 

It comes after the cloud provider reported service disruption related to the Iran conflict in Bahrain and the UAE earlier in March.

In the UAE, two AWS facilities were directly struck by drones. In Bahrain, a drone strike landed in close proximity to company facilities and caused physical damage.

These previous AWS disruptions caused reported outages of apps and digital services in the UAE.

In recent weeks, Iran has continued to launch missile and drone strikes on its Middle East neighbors as part of its retaliation against Israel and the U.S.

The Women’s National Basketball Player’s Association ratified the terms of a new collective bargaining agreement Monday, calling it “transformational” and “bigger than basketball.”

The new CBA begins this season and runs through 2032.

When asked her opinion of the most important outcome from the deal, WNBPA President Nneka Ogwumike had two words: “Bank accounts.”

“Being able to have your worth tied mostly in your salary is all that we’ve been fighting for, and it’s what we were able to achieve,” Ogwumike told CNBC Sport in an interview.

The deal increases the average player salary to $583,000 in 2026 with the potential to increase to more than $1 million by 2032. The maximum salary for players will now be $1.4 million in 2026 and could grow to more than $2.4 million by 2032, based on current WNBA financial projections.

Ogwumike acknowledged the salary increases may change players’ plans for how they spend their off-seasons.

The average WNBA salary was $120,000 in 2025, spurring many players to play abroad or in other leagues, such as 3-on-3 league Unrivaled, for extra money.

“Prioritizing where you want to play is going to look a lot different now that we’ve been able to negotiate a structure, a salary structure, that is tied to the revenue of the business,” Ogwumike said.

Several WNBA players, including five-time WNBA All-Star Napheesa Collier, have expressed a loss of confidence in WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert in recent months, criticizing her empathy and communication with players. Ogwumike expressed optimism that players will be able to work in tandem with Engelbert under the new CBA structure.

“I told her that we’re standing here with you, Cathy,” Ogwumike said. “We were able to come to this deal and go through the process of this deal, however bumpy or smooth it was, we got here. It’s important for her to understand that we as players are at the table with her and all WNBA leadership to have achieved something that’s incredibly historical. So, I feel like there probably isn’t a better way to represent us settling our differences and moving forward in a league that we all care about then by signing this deal.”

— CNBC’s Jessica Golden contributed to this report.