Dem Washington House majority leader Joe Fitzgibbon apologizes for being ‘impaired’ during budget hearing: ‘Made a poor choice’



A Democratic Washington state lawmaker has apologized after admitting he showed up to a committee hearing after drinking alcohol and making somewhat slurred remarks during the proceeding.

Democratic state Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon, the state House majority leader, said it was a “serious mistake for many reasons” when he appeared at a House Appropriations Committee meeting Wednesday where he discussed the operating budget. 

“I made a poor choice last night by drinking alcohol before we had finished our work for the day,” Fitzgibbon explained in a statement to “The Jason Rantz Show,” which first reported on the ordeal.

“I am disappointed in myself and take responsibility for that poor choice. It won’t happen again, and I’m committed to completing my work this session without alcohol.”

During the hearing, Fitzgibbon spoke about the budget and appeared to slur his words at times. 

Democratic state Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon, the state House majority leader, said it was a “serious mistake for many reasons” when he appeared at a House Appropriations Committee meeting on Feb. 25, 2026. TVW
During the hearing, Fitzgibbon spoke about the budget and appeared to slur his words at times.  AP

“I am grateful to all the members of this committee and all the members of the house for putting forward their ideas and putting forward that … that … the … the operating budget that we put forward does not forget that the people we are working to represent, the people we are working to lift up and support … don’t always have a voice in this process,” Fitzgibbon said, Fox Seattle reported. 

In a statement to the news outlet, he said being impaired “was harmful to my work and to my co-workers” and embarrassing. 

Fox News Digital has reached out to Fitzgibbon and the Washington State Republican Party. 

In a statement Fitzgibbon said being impaired “was harmful to my work and to my co-workers” and embarrassing.  AP

State House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, also a Democrat, said while Fitzgibbon failed to meet behavorial standards associated with his appearance at the hearing, he has “acknowledged that behavior is unacceptable and has apologized.”

She said House Democratic leaders stand with Fitzgibbon as he takes steps to ensure his well-being. 

It is unclear whether Fitzgibbon will face any disciplinary action.


Justice Department will allow lawmakers to see unredacted versions of released Epstein files



The Department of Justice will allow members of Congress to review unredacted files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein starting on Monday, according to a letter that was sent to lawmakers.

The letter obtained by The Associated Press says that lawmakers will be able to review unredacted versions of the more than 3 million files that the Justice Department has released to comply with a law passed by Congress last year.

To access the files, lawmakers will need to give the Justice Department 24 hours’ notice.

Documents that were included in the U.S. Department of Justice release of the Jeffrey Epstein files are photographed on Jan. 2, 2026. AP

They will be able to review the files on computers at the Department of Justice. Only lawmakers, not their staff, will have access to the files, and they will be permitted to take notes, but not make electronic copies.

The arrangement, first reported by NBC News, showed the continued demand for information on Epstein and his crimes by lawmakers, even after the Justice Department devoted large numbers of its staff to comply with the law passed by Congress last year.

The Justice Department has come under criticism for delays in the release of information, failing to redact the personal information and photos of victims and not releasing the entire 6 million documents collected in relation to Epstein.

Still, lawmakers central to the push for transparency, described the concession by the Justice Department as a victory.

“When Congress pushes back, Congress can prevail,” Rep. Ro Khanna, who sponsored what’s known as the Epstein Files Transparency Act, posted on social media.

House Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer speaks during a hearing on Jan. 21, 2026. Getty Images

Khanna has pointed to several emails between Epstein and individuals whose information was redacted that appeared to refer to the sexual abuse of underage girls.

The release of the case files has prompted inquiries around the world about men who cavorted with the well-connected financier.

Still, lawmakers are pressing for a further reckoning over anyone who may have had knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or could have helped facilitate it.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche meets with reporters as the Justice Department announced the release of three million pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein on Jan. 30, 2026. AP

Epstein killed himself in a New York jail cell in 2019 while he faced charges that he sexually abused and trafficked dozens of underage girls.

The case was brought more than a decade after he secretly cut a deal with federal prosecutors in Florida to dispose of nearly identical allegations.

Epstein was accused of paying underage girls hundreds of dollars in cash for massages and then molesting them.