Energy-hungry Nova Scotia companies nearly doubled their solar power capacity in 2025 – Halifax | Globalnews.ca


Energy-hungry companies in Nova Scotia are heading toward the light.

Energy-hungry Nova Scotia companies nearly doubled their solar power capacity in 2025 – Halifax | Globalnews.ca

New statistics from the province’s private power utility show that commercial players grew their capacity to generate solar energy by 82 per cent last year.

Energy consultant David Brushett says that’s partly because legislative changes a few years ago have allowed companies to sell 10 times more energy to Nova Scotia Power than before.

Get daily Canada news delivered to your inbox so you'll never miss the day's top stories.

Get daily National news

Get daily Canada news delivered to your inbox so you’ll never miss the day’s top stories.

The solar growth spurt comes as Nova Scotia Power seeks to have 80 per cent of its energy come from renewable sources by 2030.


Renewables generated 42 per cent of the utility’s power in 2025 and it says solar currently makes up about one per cent of the energy mix.

While solar is growing, most renewable energy is expected to come from onshore wind farms and hydro power imported from Labrador.

&copy 2026 The Canadian Press


Oil prices rise as Trump reaffirms Tuesday deadline for bombarding Iran’s power plants, bridges


A drone view of oil storage containers and facilities of the TotalEnergies refinery in the Leuna Chemical Complex, in Leuna, Germany, March 17, 2026.

Annegret Hilse | Reuters

Oil prices edged higher after U.S. President Donald Trump doubled down on his threats to attack Iran’s civil infrastructure, warning that the nation will be “taken out in one night,” if the Islamic Republic’s leadership failed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures for May were up 0.93% at $113.46 per barrel as of 8:45 p.m. ET. Brent crude for June delivery gained about 0.54% to $110.36 per barrel.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

Oil prices rise as Trump reaffirms Tuesday deadline for bombarding Iran’s power plants, bridges

Brent crude prices

On Monday, Trump repeated his threat that the U.S. will destroy Iran’s power plants and bridges if Tehran did not reopen the Strait of Hormuz by 8 p.m. ET on Tuesday, while also signaling that Iranian leadership was negotiating in earnest.

The closure of the narrow waterway connecting the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman has led to a supply shock, sending prices for crude, jet fuel, diesel, and gasoline soaring since the war broke out on Feb. 28.

“They have ’til tomorrow,” the president said. “Now we’ll see what happens. I can tell you, they are negotiating, we think in good faith, we’re going to find out. We’re getting the help of some incredible countries that want this to be ended, because it affects them also.”

Reuters reported that the U.S. and Iran were discussing a framework plan to end their 5-week-old conflict, as Tehran has pushed back against Trump’s pressure to swiftly reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which would allow traffic to start flowing again through the vital energy artery.

Iran has rejected the U.S. ceasefire proposal, presenting its own 10-point plan, according to Axios, including a permanent end to hostilities in the region, rather than a temporary ceasefire, a protocol for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, lifting of sanctions, and reconstruction.

But the changes for a ceasefire deal to be reached before the deadline remained slim, according to the report.

Trump responded to the proposal, saying that “They made a … significant proposal. Not good enough, but they have made a very significant step. We will see what happens.”

“As the deadline approaches, [Trump] wants to apply even more pressure to get them across the finish line,” Brain Jacobsen, chief economic strategist at Annex Wealth Management.

Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz is slowly resuming, with 8 tankers transiting Monday, up from the average of fewer than 2 transits per day in March, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence. That, however, is a fraction of the pre-war levels with an average of 20 million barrels of crude oil and products transiting per day via the strait in 2025.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.


Gevo Licenses Catalyst Technologies for Jet Fuel Production


BYLINE: Tina M. Johnson

Newswise — Gevo, an advanced biofuels company based in Colorado, has licensed two patented catalyst technologies from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for use in the production of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF).

“This partnership will streamline the transition of ORNL’s catalyst technologies from lab scale to pilot-scale reactors,” said Andrew Sutton, senior scientist in the Manufacturing Science Division at ORNL. “By demonstrating industrial viability, our goal is to accelerate the commercialization of this technology in the U.S., boosting global competitiveness and domestic production of aviation fuel.”

SAF is an alternative fuel made from plant- or waste-based feedstocks. The International Air Transport Association, representing more than 80% of global air traffic, is interested in SAF. Many air carriers have agreed to buy the fuel at scale, but production efficiencies remain an issue.

To meet the challenge, researchers at ORNL developed catalysts that enable a single-step conversion of ethanol to olefins (ETO), which can then be used to produce SAF. A catalyst accelerates chemical reactions and enhances the efficiency of the fuel production process.

In addition to SAF, olefins serve as key building blocks for a wide range of products, including plastics, solvents and surfactants. The global plastics market is poised for continued growth, with forecasts predicting a market worth more than $1.3 trillion by 2033.

Ethanol, commonly derived from agricultural or cellulosic feedstocks, often serves as the basis for SAF production through its conversion to olefins — key intermediates that simplify and reduce the cost of large-scale fuel manufacturing. Building on this foundation, ORNL’s novel conversion process not only achieves high carbon efficiency but does so at equal or lower cost compared with conventional methods.

Through the DOE Technology Commercialization Fund, the partnership was awarded support for a three-year cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA) to advance this technology for pilot-scale operation and industrial commercialization. Gevo will guide the overall process model and provide industry know-how for successful implementation in the company’s pilot reactor.

“Gevo’s collaboration with Oak Ridge National Laboratory focuses on evaluating a novel catalytic process that converts ethanol into valuable fuel precursors and alternative chemicals like butadiene,” said Andrew Ingram, Gevo’s director of process chemistry and catalysis. “This work complements our broader ethanol conversion portfolio but is distinct from both our commercial deployment of Axens’ alcohol-to-jet process and our next-generation ETO platform. If the economics prove out, this pathway could provide a flexible, cost-effective option to scale U.S. bio-based solutions, driven by American innovation that creates new markets and demand for farmers producing feedstocks for energy and materials.”

ORNL provides extensive scale-up expertise, employing advanced characterization capabilities at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, which was used to provide deeper insight into catalytic processes in larger chemical reactors.

Under the CRADA, ORNL will develop catalyst pellets and test their performance in an advanced chemical reactor. Researchers will develop a computational model based on the testing data generated that can accurately predict how the process will behave at scale to clear the way for industrial use. 

Global demand for jet fuel is expected to increase from 106 billion gallons in 2019 to 230 billion gallons by 2050. Expanding SAF use could help the aviation industry meet this demand while advancing U.S. energy independence and security.

This project was supported by DOE’s Alternative Fuels and Feedstocks Office, formerly known as the Bioenergy Technologies Office, through the Chemical Catalysis for Bioenergy (ChemCatBio), a multi-laboratory consortium focused on accelerating the development of catalytic technologies that convert biomass and waste resources into bio-based fuels and chemicals. Initial program funding was provided by ORNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development and Technology Innovation programs.

In addition to Sutton, Stephen Purdy, Meijun Li, Michael Cordon and Hunter Jacobs are currently contributing to the CRADA project. Inventors of the patented technologies include ORNL’s Li and Brian Davison, former ORNL researcher Zhenglong Li and the University of Maryland’s Junyan Zhang. Jennifer Caldwell within Technology Transfer at ORNL negotiated the terms of the licensing agreement. Browse available chemical technologies for licensing.

UT-Battelle manages ORNL for DOE’s Office of Science, the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States. The Office of Science is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time. For more information, please visit https://energy.gov/science. — Tina M. Johnson




Pair of Democrat lawmakers slam ‘blockade of fuel’ to Cuba, ‘economic bombing’ after visit to island


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Reps. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., and Jonathan Jackson, D-Ill., said after a congressional delegation returned from Cuba that U.S. economic restrictions on the island represented an “illegal U.S. blockade of fuel” and “effectively an economic bombing of the infrastructure of the country.”

The lawmakers, following their five-day delegation to Cuba, spoke out against what they described as a humanitarian crisis on the island that they argue is linked to the U.S. embargo. 

“The illegal U.S. blockade of fuel to Cuba—90 miles south of the United States—adds to the longest embargo in world history and is causing untold suffering to the Cuban people,” the lawmakers said in a statement on Sunday. “The United States prevented a single drop of oil from entering Cuba for over three months. This is cruel collective punishment—effectively an economic bombing of the infrastructure of the country—that has produced permanent damage. It must stop immediately.”

US ALLOWS RUSSIAN OIL TANKER TO REACH CUBA AMID BLOCKADE AS TRUMP SAYS ISLAND ‘HAS TO SURVIVE’

Pair of Democrat lawmakers slam ‘blockade of fuel’ to Cuba, ‘economic bombing’ after visit to island

Reps. Pramila Jayapal and Jonathan Jackson said after a delegation to Cuba that  there was a humanitarian crisis on the island. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“We witnessed firsthand premature babies in incubators, weighing just two pounds, who are at tremendous risk because their ventilators and incubators cannot function without electricity,” they continued. “Children cannot attend school because there is no fuel for them or their teachers to travel. Cancer patients cannot receive lifesaving treatments because of lack of medications. There is a water shortage because there is little electricity to pump water. Businesses have closed. Families cannot keep food refrigerated, and food production on the island has dropped to just 10 percent of the people’s needs.”

This comes as U.S. President Donald Trump has escalated his pressure campaign on Cuba in recent weeks, calling the island a “failed nation” and suggesting that “Cuba is next” following recent U.S. military actions in Venezuela and Iran.

The trip came after Jayapal and Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., introduced legislation to block federal funds for military action against Cuba without congressional approval.

Rep. Jonathan Jackson

The two lawmakers spoke out against what they described as an “illegal U.S. blockade of fuel” and “effectively an economic bombing of the infrastructure of the country.” (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Jayapal and Jackson said they spoke with families, religious leaders, entrepreneurs, civil society organizations, the Cuban government, Latin American and African ambassadors, humanitarian aid organizations and Cubans across the political spectrum, including dissidents.

“Across all sectors, there is agreement: this illegal blockade must end immediately. We do not believe that the majority of Americans would want this kind of cruelty and inhumanity to continue in our name,” the lawmakers said.

The pair added that the Cuban government “has sent many signals that this is a new moment for the country.”

“While we were there, President Diaz-Canel released over 2,000 prisoners. The Cuban government has begun to liberalize its economy with significant reforms, including allowing Cuban American entrepreneurs to invest in private businesses in Cuba. Entrepreneurship has grown substantially, with small- and medium-sized private businesses now comprising large parts of the economy,” the statement said.

CUBA RELEASES 2,000 PRISONERS AMID TRUMP PRESSURE, ENERGY CRISIS

President Donald Trump gesturing as he speaks

U.S. President Donald Trump has escalated his pressure campaign on Cuba in recent weeks. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“Significantly, the Cuban government has invited in the FBI to conduct an independent investigation of a lethal speedboat shooting,” it continued. “The remaining obstacles to progress in Cuba now rest with the United States changing our outdated, Cold War-era policy of coercive economic measures and military pressures against Cuba.”

Jayapal and Jackson went on to say that “true reform will only come from charting a new course.”

“The United States and Cuba must immediately enter into real negotiations that provide for the dignity and freedom of the Cuban people and the tremendous benefits to the American people that will accrue from a real collaboration between our two countries,” they concluded.


As fuel prices soar, voters tell Miliband to ditch his Net Zero obsession and lift ban on North Sea oil and gas that would make ALL our lives easier


Labour should lift its ban on drilling in the North Sea immediately to stop households being hammered by the cost of the Iran crisis, voters have said.

The findings – that Energy Secretary Ed Miliband should ditch Net Zero dogma and release the £165billion worth of oil and gas beneath British waters – come amid a growing Cabinet split on the issue and mounting pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves to scrap planned petrol tax hikes in the autumn.

Since Iran began its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz following US and Israeli attacks, global energy prices have soared, with the cost of a litre of diesel in the UK heading towards the £2 mark.

Research conducted by former Conservative deputy chairman Lord Ashcroft has found that half of all voters think Mr Miliband should ‘drill, baby, drill’ – in the words of Donald Trump, who was elected in the US on a promise to ramp up gas and oil production.

The poll, shared with The Mail on Sunday, also shows an unprecedented three-way split between the Tories, Reform and the Greens, who are all on 21 per cent, with Labour trailing in fourth place on 17 per cent.

It is the first time in nearly a year that Reform UK has not led in a survey and will add to mounting anxiety within the party over Nigel Farage’s apparent loss of momentum ahead of next month’s local elections.

With no end in sight to the Iran war:

  • The desperate hunt for an American airman downed in Iran intensified on Saturday night as US special forces raced against armed nomads to find the missing crewman in the south of the country;
As fuel prices soar, voters tell Miliband to ditch his Net Zero obsession and lift ban on North Sea oil and gas that would make ALL our lives easier

Research conducted by former Conservative deputy chairman Lord Ashcroft has found that half of all voters think Mr Miliband should ‘drill, baby, drill’. Pictured: Mr Miliband on a visit to the Port of Holyhead, North Wales in 2024

Since Iran began its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, following US and Israeli attacks, global energy prices have soared. Pictured: File photo of an offshore oil and gas platform

Since Iran began its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, following US and Israeli attacks, global energy prices have soared. Pictured: File photo of an offshore oil and gas platform 

The findings – that Energy Secretary Ed Miliband should ditch Net Zero dogma and release the £165billion worth of oil and gas beneath British waters – come amid a growing Cabinet split on the issue. Pictured: Mr Miliband on BBC current affairs programme Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg last month

The findings – that Energy Secretary Ed Miliband should ditch Net Zero dogma and release the £165billion worth of oil and gas beneath British waters – come amid a growing Cabinet split on the issue. Pictured: Mr Miliband on BBC current affairs programme Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg last month

  • President Trump issued a blistering warning to Iran to re-open the Strait of Hormuz, warning on social media: ‘Time is running out – 48 hours before all hell will reign [sic] down on them. Glory be to God!’
  • An elite team of Royal Navy divers are on standby to deploy to the Strait of Hormuz to help defuse Iranian sea mines blocking shipping lanes;
  • Former RAF pilot John Peters – who was shot down and captured in Iraq in 1991 – warned the downed airman would be involved in a desperate bid to evade capture.

A fifth of the world’s oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz and its closure has put intense pressure on the global economy.

Britain’s North Sea oil reserves were central to Margaret Thatcher’s administration in the 1980s, with the £70billion in revenues helping to fund industrial restructuring and tax cuts.

Mr Miliband has stuck to his Net Zero-driven opposition to new fossil fuel extraction, insisting that approving new drilling licences would not lower bills for UK consumers.

Last week, he said that ‘people who say new exploration licences will somehow create huge amounts of energy for us’ were ‘just wrong’.

Ms Reeves, by contrast, has said she is ‘very happy’ to back exploration at the Rosebank oilfield and Jackdaw gas field in the North Sea.

Mr Miliband (pictured, on a visit to the London Power Tunnels last month) has stuck to his Net Zero-driven opposition to new fossil fuel extraction

Mr Miliband (pictured, on a visit to the London Power Tunnels last month) has stuck to his Net Zero-driven opposition to new fossil fuel extraction

But the Tories and Reform have called for the Energy Secretary to reverse his 'ideological' opposition to accessing the three billion barrels of oil and gas, which are worth about £165billion. Pictured: The Well-Safe Protector oil rig in Aberdeen

But the Tories and Reform have called for the Energy Secretary to reverse his ‘ideological’ opposition to accessing the three billion barrels of oil and gas, which are worth about £165billion. Pictured: The Well-Safe Protector oil rig in Aberdeen 

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch (pictured, on a visit to a chemical company in Teesside on the local election campaign trail this week) has called the failure to tap North Sea oil and gas 'economic insanity'

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch (pictured, on a visit to a chemical company in Teesside on the local election campaign trail this week) has called the failure to tap North Sea oil and gas ‘economic insanity’

On Saturday night, Reform's deputy leader Richard Tice (pictured, at a Reform UK press conference last month) told this newspaper: 'This poll proves that the British people have far more common sense than the political class'

On Saturday night, Reform’s deputy leader Richard Tice (pictured, at a Reform UK press conference last month) told this newspaper: ‘This poll proves that the British people have far more common sense than the political class’

The Tories and Reform have called for the Energy Secretary to reverse his ‘ideological’ opposition to accessing the three billion barrels of oil and gas, which are worth about £165billion, with Tory leader Kemi Badenoch describing the failure as ‘economic insanity’. 

On Saturday night, Reform’s deputy leader Richard Tice told this newspaper: ‘This poll proves that the British people have far more common sense than the political class. 

‘We’ve got hundreds of billions of pounds worth of energy treasure sitting under our feet.

‘It’s our patriotic duty to maximise British gas production, create jobs, boost growth, and achieve true energy independence.

‘Labour and the Tories have failed on this for years. Reform will lift the restrictions on day one, get drilling and deliver lower bills for everyone.’

That view has been echoed by President Trump, who has described the North Sea as a ‘treasure chest’ for the UK and urged Sir Keir Starmer to take advantage of it.

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, the SNP, Tony Blair’s think tank and the Labour-supporting GMB Union have also expressed their support.

The average price of a litre of diesel at UK forecourts is up 30 per cent since the start of the war to 185.2p and could breach £2 within weeks, experts have warned.

Meanwhile, petrol prices have risen 16 per cent to an average of 154.5p per litre over the same period.

That view has been echoed by US President Donald Trump (pictured during a televised address on the war in the Middle East this week), who has described the North Sea as a 'treasure chest' for the UK and urged Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to take advantage of it

That view has been echoed by US President Donald Trump (pictured during a televised address on the war in the Middle East this week), who has described the North Sea as a ‘treasure chest’ for the UK and urged Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to take advantage of it

The average price of a litre of diesel at UK forecourts is up 30 per cent since the start of the war to 185.2p and could breach £2 within weeks, experts have warned. Pictured: File photo of a petrol and diesel price sign at a station in London this week

The average price of a litre of diesel at UK forecourts is up 30 per cent since the start of the war to 185.2p and could breach £2 within weeks, experts have warned. Pictured: File photo of a petrol and diesel price sign at a station in London this week 

Meanwhile, Chancellor Rachel Reeves (pictured in the House of Commons last month) is planning to end the current 5p a litre fuel duty relief in September

Meanwhile, Chancellor Rachel Reeves (pictured in the House of Commons last month) is planning to end the current 5p a litre fuel duty relief in September

Ms Reeves, who is raking in more than £100million in extra VAT receipts each month, is planning to end the current 5p a litre fuel duty relief in September, a move which will add, on average, another £3 to the cost of filling a tank.

Governments around the world have been lowering fuel taxes to ease the burden on households from soaring petrol and diesel prices.

Anthony Albanese, the Australian Prime Minister, has already halved fuel duty.

Writing in this week’s Mail on Sunday, Lord Ashcroft says: ‘Having seen how precarious our supplies from the Middle East can be, more think the Government should end its absurd ban on new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea than keep it.

‘For worried families, household bills and security of supply tend to win out over Net Zero targets.’


Can Practical Superconductors Work Without Extreme Cooling?


Newswise — Scientists discovered how tiny changes in superhydride structure enable superconductivity at near room temperatures but extreme pressure — offering clues for designing more practical superconductors.

Superconductors allow electricity to flow without resistance, meaning no energy is lost as heat. This property makes them useful for technologies such as MRI scanners, particle accelerators, magnetic-levitation trains and some power-transmission systems. Most superconductors, however, only work at extremely low temperatures — often hundreds of degrees below zero Fahrenheit. Keeping materials that cold requires complex and costly cooling systems, which limits where the superconductors can be used.

Researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory have helped take a step toward easing that limitation. They have gained new insight into a class of materials called superhydrides that can become superconducting at much higher temperatures — around 10 degrees Fahrenheit.

The research was carried out with collaborators from the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC), the University of Chicago and DOE’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. A key tool was the upgraded Advanced Photon Source (APS), a DOE Office of Science user facility at Argonne.

“These experiments show what the upgraded APS can do. We can now study atomic-level structures with unprecedented detail in materials under extreme pressure.” — Maddury Somayazulu, Argonne physicist

Superhydrides are made mostly of hydrogen, held together in an ordered structure (crystal) by a small number of metal atoms. When subjected to extremely high pressures, these materials can carry electric current with no resistance. In a landmark 2018 study, researchers led by UIC professor Russell Hemley showed that a lanthanum-based superhydride could superconduct near 8 degrees Fahrenheit. The drawback was that it only worked at pressures equivalent to those deep within the Earth (1.88 million atmospheres), making it impractical outside the lab.

In the new study, Hemley and his fellow researchers explored whether changing the material’s chemistry could lower the pressure needed for superconductivity. They added a small amount of yttrium to the lanthanum superhydride to make it more stable and reduce the pressure required.

“To reach these extreme pressures, we squeezed a tiny sample between two diamonds,” said Maddury Somayazulu, a physicist at the APS. The team’s diamond-anvil device can generate pressures as high as five million atmospheres.

After forming the superconducting material at high pressure and temperature, the team used high-energy X-rays from the APS to study its structure (at beamlines 16-ID-B and 13-ID-D). ​“We focused an intense X-ray beam onto a sample only a few micrometers thick and about ten to twenty micrometers across,” said Vitali Prakapenka, a beamline scientist and research professor at the University of Chicago. One micrometer is about 1/70th the width of a human hair.

The recent APS upgrade made these measurements possible. Its brighter, more tightly focused X-ray beam allowed researchers to study extremely small samples while changing the pressure. ​“That beam allowed us to separate signals coming from the tiny sample itself as opposed to those coming from the surrounding materials and diamond anvils,” Prakapenka said.

The team found that small differences in how atoms are arranged in a crystalline lattice can strongly affect superconductivity. They identified two different crystal structures, each becoming superconducting at a slightly different temperature.

“These experiments show what the upgraded APS can do,” Somayazulu said. ​“We can now study atomic-level structures with unprecedented detail in materials under extreme pressure.”

Although the pressures used in the experiments are still very high — about 1.4 million times atmospheric pressure — the researchers see this as part of a longer path forward. They are adding more elements to lower the pressure further with the goal of making these materials practical.

Diamonds provide a useful comparison, Somayazulu explained. Natural diamonds form deep inside the Earth under extreme pressure and temperature. Scientists later learned how to synthesize them in the lab, and eventually how to produce them without such intense conditions. Researchers believe superhydrides could follow a similar path.

“If we understand the physics well enough, we may be able to stabilize these structures at much lower pressures but still attain superconductivity close to room temperature,” Prakapenka said.

Experimental data from the APS will help guide theoretical models and AI tools in that search for new materials. Instead of testing only a few combinations at quite-challenging-to-reach extreme conditions, scientists can use AI to explore many possible multi-element compositions. They can then focus experiments on the most promising ones.

“The calculations are very demanding,” Prakapenka said. ​“Theorists rely on high-quality experimental data to make their predictions more accurate.”

Finding a material that superconducts at near room temperature and normal pressure could reshape the nation’s electrical infrastructure.

The research was supported by the DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences, DOE National Nuclear Security Administration and the National Science Foundation. Contributors include Maddury Somayazulu, Russell Hemley, Vitali Prakapenka, Abdul Haseeb Manayil-Marathamkottil, Kui Wang, Nilesh Salke, Muhtar Ahart, Alexander Mark, Rostislav Hrubiak, Stella Chariton, Dean Smith and Nenad Velisavljevic.

This article was adapted from the UIC release.

About the Advanced Photon Source

The U. S. Department of Energy Office of Science’s Advanced Photon Source (APS) at Argonne National Laboratory is one of the world’s most productive X-ray light source facilities. The APS provides high-brightness X-ray beams to a diverse community of researchers in materials science, chemistry, condensed matter physics, the life and environmental sciences, and applied research. These X-rays are ideally suited for explorations of materials and biological structures; elemental distribution; chemical, magnetic, electronic states; and a wide range of technologically important engineering systems from batteries to fuel injector sprays, all of which are the foundations of our nation’s economic, technological, and physical well-being. Each year, more than 5,000 researchers use the APS to produce over 2,000 publications detailing impactful discoveries, and solve more vital biological protein structures than users of any other X-ray light source research facility. APS scientists and engineers innovate technology that is at the heart of advancing accelerator and light-source operations. This includes the insertion devices that produce extreme-brightness X-rays prized by researchers, lenses that focus the X-rays down to a few nanometers, instrumentation that maximizes the way the X-rays interact with samples being studied, and software that gathers and manages the massive quantity of data resulting from discovery research at the APS.

This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. DOE Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.

Argonne National Laboratory seeks solutions to pressing national problems in science and technology by conducting leading-edge basic and applied research in virtually every scientific discipline. Argonne is managed by UChicago Argonne, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science.

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States and is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time. For more information, visit https://​ener​gy​.gov/​s​c​ience.




When Neutron Stars Collide, Neutrinos Change Flavors


The Science

Newswise — Neutron stars are among the densest objects in the universe. They are packed so tightly that a spoonful of their matter weighs more than a mountain. When two neutron stars collide, they release huge numbers of tiny particles called neutrinos. Neutrinos are fundamental particles that come in three types, or “flavors.” These flavors can change into one another as they travel, a process known as neutrino oscillation. This simulation shows that such changes affect the ratio of neutrons to protons in the matter thrown out of the crash. If the ejecta becomes richer in neutrons, it may produce more heavy elements such as gold and platinum.

The Impact

This work presents the first supercomputer simulations that include neutrino flavor transformations in neutron star mergers. The simulations show that as neutrinos change their flavor, neutron star mergers become an even more powerful factory for producing heavy elements, like gold. By influencing the mix of neutrons and protons, neutrinos play a hidden but vital role in shaping the origins of matter in the universe. The collisions also shake space itself. They create gravitational waves — ripples in the fabric of space and time that observatories on Earth can detect. Neutrinos changing their flavor in these collisions could also affect the gravitational waves resulting from the mergers. Adding neutrino oscillations to computer models will help scientists better analyze data from gravitational waves.

Summary

Neutron star mergers are key factories of heavy elements, via the rapid neutron capture process (the r-process). Neutrinos also play a central role in the production of heavy elements by setting the neutron-to-proton ratio in the matter these mergers eject. In this study, astrophysicists performed simulations in numerical relativity that included neutrino flavor mixing. This aspect had been neglected in most previous studies. The team employed a relaxation operator to model flavor equilibration, under different density thresholds, and compared these with the no-mixing case. They found that flavor mixing tends to reduce electron type neutrino abundances in low-density regions and make the ejecta more neutron rich.  In some cases, there is neutron enhancement by more than a factor of five. This change produces increases in the yields of heavy elements (lanthanide and heavier) by orders of magnitude, compared to simulations which neglect neutrino mixing. The results also demonstrate that neutrino flavor transformations can potentially alter observable signatures of neutron star mergers, such as gravitational waves.

Funding

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Division of Nuclear Physics, National Science Foundation, and the Sloan Foundation. It used computational resources from the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, as well as institutions’ supercomputing centers.


Journal Link: Physical Review Letters, 135 091401 (2025)




EV demand is getting a boost from the Iran war — just as auto giants pivot back to combustion engines


An electric vehicle (EV) is left to charge at a charging station in Tehran on February 23, 2026.

Atta Kenare | Afp | Getty Images

The sprawling Middle East crisis is expected to spur drivers to abandon traditional internal combustion engine vehicles in favor of EVs, analysts told CNBC, although early evidence suggests this will be a gradual gearshift.

The Iran war has severely disrupted oil exports through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, which typically carries about a fifth of the world’s oil and liquified natural gas (LNG). It has underlined the extent to which the world remains deeply reliant on fragile fossil fuel trade routes, while surging oil and gas prices have jolted energy markets and triggered widespread inflation fears.

Various car-selling platforms in the U.S. and Europe have reported a sharp increase in consumer interest for EVs since the war began in late February. The burgeoning trend comes even as a large chunk of the legacy car industry pivots back to internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles.

Autotrader, an online vehicles marketplace, reported on March 26 a 28% jump in inquiries about buying a new EV and a 15% increase in inquiries about buying a used one, since the war in Iran started on Feb. 28. EV specialist Octopus Electric Vehicles said on March 25 it had seen EV leasing inquiries rise 36% since the start of the conflict.

But U.S. automakers Ford Motor, General Motors and Jeep owner Stellantis have all reversed course on EV strategies, booking tens of billions of dollars in combined write-offs and restructuring costs, in part due to lackluster consumer demand and shifting political landscapes.

It is indeed quite frustrating how we again talk about EVs as if we didn’t know that this is the structural measure to wean our transport system off oil.

Julia Poliscanova

senior director for vehicles and e-mobility supply chains at Transport & Environment

Steffen Michulski, senior consultant at JATO Dynamics, said that while the situation is still evolving, it was already clear that the fallout from the Iran war could influence EV demand.

Owning a battery electric vehicle (BEV) has become more compelling for drivers covering a lot of mileage, Michulski said, given that a sharp rise in oil prices has made conventional gasoline cars much more expensive.

Switching to an EV may also provide households with an extra layer of energy independence, Michulski said, although he cautioned that it would be important not to “oversimplify” the situation. He pointed out that the overall economic environment may soften if inflation and supply chain costs continue to rise, for example, with these broader pressures impacting all powertrains — electric or combustion.

EV demand is getting a boost from the Iran war — just as auto giants pivot back to combustion engines

“To shorten and summarize it: Yes, elevated oil prices and the renewed focus on energy security are likely to provide a mid term boost to BEV demand,” Michulski told CNBC by email.

“But this is best understood as an incremental shift rather than a sudden market wide acceleration. Electricity price risks, technological progress on the combustion side, and general economic uncertainty all act as counterweights,” he added.

An uptick in car shoppers considering EVs

Consumers may be more likely to consider all-electric vehicles amid higher gas prices but changing buying behaviors from traditional vehicles to EVs can be slow, according to Erin Keating, Cox Automotive’s senior director of economic and industry insights.

Cox expects gas prices will need to be inflated for six months or more for any notable increase in consumer buying habits for EVs, officials said during a call on March 25. Hurdles such as cost, charging infrastructure and range anxiety — the fear that an EV will run out of power before reaching a destination — remain, according to Keating.

Cox reports the average price for a new EV in the U.S. was $55,300 during the first quarter. That’s lower than in recent quarters but still higher than non-EV models at $48,768.

U.S. EV sales remain lower despite higher gas prices. Cox forecasts U.S. EV sales during the first quarter will be down 28% to 212,600 units.

However, electrified vehicle sales, which include EVs and hybrid vehicles, continue to increase as automakers shift their focus from EVs to hybrids, seeking a compromise to meet consumers’ expectations for fuel economy.

The GM logo on the water tank of the General Motors Ramos Arizpe assembly plant, in Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila state, Mexico, Jan. 19, 2026.

Antonio Ojeda | Reuters

Sales of electrified vehicles, led by Toyota hybrids, are expected to account for a record 26% of new vehicles sold during the first quarter, according to Cox.

Early signals from CarMax’s Edmunds.com suggest an uptick in car shoppers considering electrified vehicles amid higher gas prices.

“Fuel prices have long influenced how drivers think about their next vehicle because they are one of the most visible costs of car ownership. But whether the latest spike translates into meaningful shifts toward electrified vehicles may depend less on the price of gasoline itself and more on how long consumers expect fuel costs to remain elevated,” Edmunds said in a statement.

An even faster shift?

In Europe and Asia, the Iran war energy shock is expected to facilitate a more profound shift towards EVs than in previous fossil fuel crises.

“It is indeed quite frustrating how we again talk about EVs as if we didn’t know that this is the structural measure to wean our transport system off oil,” Julia Poliscanova, senior director for vehicles and e-mobility supply chains at the campaign group Transport & Environment, told CNBC by video call.

“I do think that this crisis might be different. In the past, there would be a crisis and then quite quickly as the crisis is over, we can go back to business as usual, and oil and gas is flowing.”

US President Donald Trump speaks with Ford executive chairman Bill Ford (L), Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Ford CEO Jim Farley (2nd R), and plant manager Corey Williams (R) as he tours Ford Motor Company’s River Rouge complex in Dearborn, Michigan, on January 13, 2026.

Mandel Ngan | Afp | Getty Images

Some of the reported damage to Middle East energy infrastructure, however, means it may take years for energy supplies to come back online, Poliscanova said.

An analysis published by Transport & Environment earlier this month found that electric cars were already cutting the European Union’s oil imports, noting that the nearly 8 million EVs in the EU will save the bloc around 46 million barrels of oil in 2025. That’s the equivalent of almost 3 billion euros ($3.45 billion) in avoided oil import costs.

In the context of the Middle East conflict, meanwhile, the analysis said that petrol drivers were expected to be five times more exposed to higher oil prices than EV owners.

Poliscanova said EV growth drivers in Asia, notably Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia, which all benefit from affordable models by Chinese car manufacturers, were all likely to see an accelerated shift away from fossil fuels.

“We’re likely to see an even faster shift in some of these economies away from oil, meaning that we in Europe today, still discussing things like biofuels and hybrids, just look really stupid and detached from the reality,” Poliscanova said.

A spokesperson for the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, declined to comment.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.


Trump’s Iran speech ignores the risks of a return to the 1970s: Analysis


Demonstrators hold posters of Ayatollah Khomeini outside the American Embassy which is occupied by ‘students following the Imam Khomeini’s line on November 16, 1979 in Tehran, Iran.

Kaveh Kazemi | Hulton Archive | Getty Images

“The hard part is done,” President Donald Trump said in his address to the nation Wednesday night about the Iran war. The recent jump in gas prices is “short term increase” that should “will rapidly come back down” once the vital Strait of Hormuz is reopened, he said.

But there is reason to worry that the conflict and its economic consequences for Americans may get worse before they get better. If so, Trump will struggle to shake off the damaging political legacy of the war.

In that he would join a long line of U.S. presidents going back to the 1970s who have seen their tenures defined by energy crisis and inflation — the economic scourge Trump has called a “nation-buster.” 

“The oil shock of the ’70s was planted in the maybe subterranean part of our brains,” said Jay Hakes, a presidential historian who led the U.S. Energy Information Administration in the 1990s during the Clinton administration. 

“It was there for a long time because it was just such a jolt. And I think this will be that kind of jolt,” Hakes said.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

Gas prices on Tuesday rose above $4 a gallon on average for the first time since the war began. Gas has followed Brent crude prices that have risen 27% since the war began to just over $100 a barrel Wednesday. Oil tankers and other commercial shippers that would normally travel through the narrow Strait of Hormuz off Iran’s southern coast have been idled due to Iran’s threats and attacks. The waterway normally carries 20% of the world’s oil. 

But $4 a gallon gas, painful as it is, may only be the tip of the iceberg. That is clearer in the rest of the world than the U.S., for now. The U.K. is set to receive its last shipment of jet fuel for the foreseeable future this week. Prices of jet fuel worldwide are up 96%, according to Platts data published by the International Air Transport Association. Futures contracts for liquid natural gas in Japan and South Korea are up 43%, according to FactSet data. 

Asia and to a lesser extent Europe are more immediately exposed to disruptions in supply from the Strait of Hormuz. Unlike the U.S. — as Trump has repeatedly pointed out — they buy directly from the Middle East. But all of these commodities are connected through global markets. Disruptions in one part of the world will quickly spread to others. Analysts fear the price of oil could jump above the record near $150 a barrel set in July 2008 during the Great Recession.

So far, the world has benefited from energy supplies that were already in transit when the war began just over a month ago, aided by emergency releases from strategic petroleum reserves. But the world is burning through those supplies. 

“With even the modest estimates we have now, the loss of oil in April will be twice the loss of oil in March,” International Energy Agency Executive Director Fatih Birol said on a podcast released Wednesday.

Energy conservation in the wake of supply disruption

Governments around the world are trying to encourage energy conservation in the face the crisis. A tracker from the IEA shows 26 governments have taken steps such as Pakistan lowering the speed limit.

Trump has taken steps to encourage the market to improve supply but has stopped short of calling on Americans to try to conserve energy. Doing so might call back uncomfortable comparisons to President Jimmy Carter’s attempts after the 1979 crisis, which began with the Iranian Revolution. Ronald Reagan turned Carter’s calls for consumers to limit themselves into a potent political weapon, winning him the presidency the next year. 

And Trump has spent part of his terms in the White House calling for limits on construction of and subsidies for renewable energy production.

The politics of energy have taken a toll on the nation. “We’ve lost our ability to ask the American public to sacrifice,” Hakes said. 

Hundred thousand of people gather at Tehran Freedom Square, formerly Monument to the Kings, to cheer the motorcade carrying Iranian opposition leader and founder of Iran’s Islamic republic ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeiny upon his return from exile on February 1, 1979 while the insurrection against the Shah’s regime spreads all over the country.

Gabriel Duval | AFP | Getty Images

Before Carter, presidents — including Republicans — called on a need for shared sacrifice. President Richard Nixon proposed a national speed limit of 55 miles per hour following the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973. It was passed into law the next year, but even before that Nixon urged people to slow down, “and they did,” Hakes said. 

“We still had a little bit of the World War II mentality,” Hakes said. 

The energy crises of the 1970s put the nail in the coffin of that mentality. Nixon and Carter struggled to lower prices, and inflation surged. Carter put Paul Volcker in place as Federal Reserve chair to tackle inflation — which he eventually did, but only by raising interest rates high enough to prompt a recession, followed by record-high mortgage rates. Carter, of course, wasn’t re-elected.

Americans’ sense of what government can and should do was permanently changed.

“The failure of the nation’s politicians to address the energy crisis contributed to the erosion of faith that Americans had in their government to solve the problems,” Princeton University historian Meg Jacobs wrote in “Panic at the Pump: The Energy Crisis and the Transformation of American Politics in the 1970s.”

“If the Vietnam war and Watergate scandal taught Americans that their presidents lied, the energy crisis showed them that their government didn’t work,” Jacobs wrote.

Today, Trump’s premise as president is that government only works when he is in charge. “Nobody knows the system better than me, which is why I alone can fix it,” he said at the 2016 Republican National Convention. He has centralized control of the executive branch in the Oval Office, drawing power from cabinet secretaries and agencies that previously operated autonomously. 

The worst-case worries may not come to pass. The U.S. could quickly force Iran to capitulate, and the global economy could heal fast, as it did after the shock of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But if not, Trump’s decision to go to war in Iran may only deepen many Americans’ alienation from their government. And as the sole decider atop the federal bureaucracy, Trump will have a difficult time convincing the public that anyone but him bears responsibility. 

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.


Why $4 a gallon gas prices won’t trigger Fed interest rate hikes — and could lead to cuts


Gas prices are displayed at a Mobil gas station on March 30, 2026 in Pasadena, California.

Mario Tama | Getty Images

Gasoline prices over $4 a gallon, part of an ongoing supply shock in the energy markets, might seem like a cue for the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates to head off inflation. At least for now, that looks like a bad bet.

Investors instead expect the central bank to hold benchmark rates steady, or even pivot back toward cuts later in the year as policymakers weigh the risk that higher energy prices will slow growth more than they fuel lasting inflation.

In market-moving remarks Monday, Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled that raising rates now could be the wrong medicine for an economy already facing a softening labor backdrop and elevated recession concerns on Wall Street.

Asked whether he thought policymakers should consider rate increases here, Powell responded: “By the time the effects of a tightening in monetary policy take effect, the oil price shock is probably long gone, and you’re weighing on the economy at a time when it’s not appropriate. So the tendency is to look through any kind of a supply shock.”

The comments come at a critical juncture for markets, which have struggled to get a handle on the Fed’s intentions amid a bevy of conflicting and perpetually shifting economic signals.

Just a few days ago, traders began to entertain the possibility that the Fed’s next move could be a hike. That mindset followed some unsettling inflation news: Import prices rose much more than expected in February, even ahead of the war-related oil spike, while the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development raised its U.S. inflation forecast dramatically, to 4.2% for 2026.

Why  a gallon gas prices won’t trigger Fed interest rate hikes — and could lead to cuts

However, Powell’s comments — complete with the usual Fed qualifiers that there are potential cases for both hikes or cuts — helped bring the market back off the hawkish position. Before the war, markets had been looking for two and possibly even three cuts this year in anticipation that inflation could continue to drift back to the Fed’s 2% target and central bankers would switch their focus to supporting the labor market.

Futures prices Tuesday morning pointed to just a 2.1% chance of a rate hike by year-end, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool. That’s despite headlines noting that regular unleaded gasoline had eclipsed $4 nationally at the pump and U.S. crude oil priced above $102 a barrel.

While there’s still plenty of uncertainty about where rates are headed, Wall Street commentary shifted back to expectations for cuts. To be sure, odds are still low for a reduction — about 25% — but they have climbed considerably over the past two days.

Inflation vs. growth

“Central bankers’ bark will be bigger than their bite” when it comes to fighting higher prices, wrote Rob Subbaraman, head of global macro research at Nomura.

“Right now, it makes sense for central banks to do nothing but sound hawkish in order to help anchor inflation expectations as headline inflation spikes,” he added. “However … the pass-through to wage growth and core inflation is likely to be limited, and instead the Middle East war could quickly morph into a global growth shock.”

Indeed, concerns about the impact that the oil price spike will have on growth superseded the worries about consumer prices, echoing Powell’s worry that hiking now won’t fix energy costs and could cause more trouble later. Policymakers are worried less about the immediate hit from energy-driven inflation than the risks that higher prices could sap consumer demand and hiring.

Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM, said central bankers should fear “demand destruction” brought on by the energy shock.

“Time is not an ally of the American economy,” he wrote. “The bigger risk is what comes next: demand destruction. That’s the economic term for what happens when high prices force people and businesses to spend less. It sounds abstract, but it’s very concrete — it means fewer cars sold, fewer homes bought, fewer restaurant meals, fewer business investments, and eventually fewer jobs.”

The Fed is in a bind policy-wise, Brusuelas added: Raising rates now risks slowing economic growth further, while standing put runs the chance that the oil situation gets worse.

Markets face oil shocks, rising yields and recession concerns

“This is the classic stagflation dilemma, and there’s no clean answer,” he said. “If the situation becomes more severe, the Fed will act. But we think more likely than not that the Fed remains patient and when it does act it will be behind the curve, adding further pressure on demand before cutting aggressively.”

Carlyle Group strategist Jason Thomas echoed those concerns, saying that not only might the Fed be forced to cut, but it also may have to move more aggressively than its typical quarter percentage point stages.

The dynamic underscores a shift in how the Fed responds to shocks — looking past temporary price spikes while focusing more on the broader economic fallout.

“This is not a Fed that will sit by idly as a temporary supply shock hammers the labor market,” wrote Thomas, the firm’s head of global research and investment strategy. “In this downside economic scenario, rate cuts could arrive as soon as September. And they’re likely to come in greater than 25 [basis point] increments.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.