Readers debate Reform’s sway on local council elections


Readers debate Reform’s sway on local council elections
Readers debate local elections, the government’s ‘U-turn’ and supermarkets and sustainability (Picture: Jon Rowley/Getty Images)

Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments

Has Reform ‘forced No. 10’ into a U-turn?

Reform UK has forced No.10 into another U-turn by having soon-to-be disbanded local authorities hold elections in May (Metro, Tue).

Some district councils are due to be merged with county councils or neighbouring authorities in a reorganisation of local government.

The government had said the elections would be a waste of money and had proposed delaying them.

It backed down after Reform initiated a legal challenge on the grounds it was undemocratic.

Nigel Farage says his is the party of efficiency in government but this step will result in a reported £63million being spent on futile elections.

It is hard to imagine any worthwhile policy changes being made during the wind-up of these bodies.

How can Reform have any credibility as the party to stop waste if it is prepared to squander public resources in this self-serving action?Bernard Winchester, Norwood

Polling Stations Open For The General Election
This reader says ‘How can Reform have any credibility as the party to stop waste if it is prepared to squander public resources in this self-serving action?’ (Picture: Getty)

Farage to thank for right to vote?

Every voter has Mr Farage and Reform to thank for restoring their right to a vote. And every British voter should punish Sir Keir Starmer and his abysmal government by voting for any party except Labour in every local election until the next General Election.

Robbing any country’s citizens of their right to a vote is both dictatorial and fascist.
Stefan Badham, Portsmouth

I am glad the elections are going ahead. The government should now bring a halt to the constant tinkering with local government, there having been changes every decade since 1965.

If the government wants to save money spent on government itself, it should start with parliament. The House of Lords is the largest parliamentary chamber in Europe.

Abolishing it would save the cost of paying its members while also removing their unaccountability.
Charles EL Gilman, Mitcham

Will Starmer really stop the bots?

If Starmer couldn’t stop the boats, why should we believe him when he says he’ll combat the perils of social media and stop the bots (Metro, Tue)? Fred, Hampshire

Britain's Prime Minister welcomes Jordan's King and Crown Prince to Downing Street
This reader says Starmer won’t be able to do it (Picture: EPA/ANDY RAIN)

Forget dating apps, it’s a single gloves site

I counted nine single gloves of various sizes and colours on my way to work. I’ve wondered about creating a ‘Gloves Reunited’ site – it would be gloverly to see them all matched up…AH, Leeds

Should nuts be ‘smothered in plastic’ at the supermarket?

I popped into a well-known supermarket last Thursday to pick up a cake for my mother and was greeted by shelves of nuts smothered in plastic.

This is exactly why supermarkets can’t be taken seriously on sustainability. Almost every week
I return single-use plastic to their head office – and to brands directly – asking, repeatedly, for a switch to biodegradable alternatives. They acknowledge it, send a copy-and-paste reply about ‘recycling targets’ and then launch even more products wrapped in the same planet-killing plastic. Meanwhile, they pat themselves on the back for scrapping plastic bags, as if that excuses everything.

If supermarkets want to talk about sustainability, they should start by tackling the most obvious problem staring customers in the face – unnecessary plastic on everyday items. Michelle Edwards, via email

Reader is anti-vaping

I am so anti-vaping. I was chatting to someone vaping in the street. As she exhaled, the wind blew a cloud of vape into my face and mouth.

For the rest of the day I had a horrible metallic taste on my tongue and my lips were slightly numb.

Whatever chemicals are in vapes it can’t be good for the lungs. In years to come the negative effects will show. 
Gareth, London

Stop hoarding Metro!

Can the old fella on the No.51 bus to Woolwich grab one Metro and not 14? You’re not a paperboy and I can never get one after you! Jon, St Paul’s Cray

Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments


What they’re not telling you about street vendors — and why restaurants are mad



Angelenos were excited to see a taco cart in Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show from Villa’s Tacos in Highland Park. 

It’s a taqueria with three store locations across LA. Locals are proud of its success. 

But few trolleys make the transition from street vendor to brick-and-mortar stores. And our local government isn’t making it any easier.

LA County just announced that it will be purchasing new equipment to give away to street vendors — “free.”

The “free” carts will be paid for by the taxes of LA County businesses — including brick-and-mortar restaurants, which are often in direct competition with the vendors. 

Some argue: hey, that’s just capitalism. Any restaurant worth its salt should have no problem competing with a little hot-dog stand next door. 

The problem is, it isn’t the big restaurants vs. the little vendors. It’s the struggling restaurants facing government taxes and fees, on the one hand, versus the nimble vendors who can evade those regulations, on the other.

In California, businesses pay state income tax, sales tax, unemployment insurance, and disability tax. Those taxes are on top of federal income, sales, and unemployment taxes, not to mention Social Security and Medicare taxes.  

In some states, restaurants can deduct what servers make in tips from their taxes. Not in California — where if a restaurant puts a required tip on the bill for a larger party, the owner has to pay taxes on the tip that goes to the server.

The City of LA adds its own sales tax, bringing the state and local total to 9.75%. There is also a city business tax, based on a percentage of what the business makes. 

Moreover, if a business operates out of a facility owned by the city or county, the business pays a “possessory interest tax,” which is essentially a property tax on a property you don’t own. The restaurant also has to pay liability insurance for the government property.  

LA City also charges its businesses an extra occupancy tax. There is even an “unsecured property tax” on any equipment the business owns or operates on government property.

Restaurants in California also have to pay for licenses from the health department and the fire department. They pay extra for a license to serve alcoholic beverages, or soft serve ice cream. They even pay a disposal fee and a fee to be connected to the sewer line.

While restaurants slow-boil in taxes and fees, their street vendor competitors don’t pay rent, or extra taxes on any facilities. They are not required to have hot running water, or provide a bathroom. And now, instead of being charged an unsecured property tax on their equipment, they are getting their carts for free from LA County.

Vendors rarely have employees, or they pay them under the table, so they don’t pay unemployment insurance or worker’s comp, while licensed restaurants in California pay some of the highest minimum wages in the country. Restaurants operating out of government spaces pay an even higher living wage. 

Restaurants, like all businesses in California, also deal with some of the worst laws for business owners, leading to frequent and frivolous law suits. One law, for example, says that an employee can sue her employer if she does not feel sufficiently protected from sexual harassment by a customer.

LA restaurants have had it particularly hard in the last few years. They faced some of the most stringent COVID rules and lockdowns, while street vendors were largely left alone. The COVID lockdowns also accelerated the trend towards delivery — and delivery companies often charge the restaurants 20-30%. 

The Palisades and Altadena Fires displaced entire communities, and while street vendors can pick up and move to better locations without much cost, brick-and-mortar restaurants are left to struggle with sky-high rents and declining business in new locations.

My father opened his first hamburger stand in LA in 1977, after immigrating to the U.S., and within a few years, he had three more. 

Back then, it cost him roughly fifty thousand dollars to start a new business. Today, it costs a new restaurant twenty thousand dollars just to connect to the sewer line.  

According to my dad, the entire process of starting a new restaurant costs around half a million. 

The truth is that the state and county’s policies aren’t even helping immigrant street vendors. Many of them find themselves trapped in small operations with low profit margins, unable to start a real business and begin building generational wealth.

Nothing in this world is ever free. Well before the socialists “eat the rich”, they will eat the dreams of the little immigrants, and destroy LA’s amazing restaurant culture for all of us.

So while we’re all happy for Villa’s Tacos, the cart is more useful as a halftime prop than as a business policy.

Lisa Cusack is Chairwoman of the California Republican 44th Assembly District and comes from a family of restaurateurs.