The 2026 Winter Olympics are here, with Milano Cortina hosting the quadrennial festival of snow and ice-based sports.
The last Winter Olympics in Beijing saw Norway top the medal table with 16 golds, ahead of Germany, USA and hosts China, while Team GB claimed just two medals – both in curling, right at the end of the Games, with Eve Muirhead skipping the women’s team to gold and Bruce Mouat skipping the men’s team to silver.
Hopes are higher for more British medals this time around, not only in the curling rink but in a number of the snow events, with UK Sport setting a target of four to eight medals and potential across a range of sports including freestyle skiing, snowboarding, and ice dance.
Milano Cortina 2026 will get underway on 4 February, with the opening ceremony two days later on 6 February, and will run until the closing ceremony on 22 February, with 116 medal events across the 19 days in Italy.
The events are split up into four main geographical zones: Milano (hosting the ceremonies and sports such as ice hockey, speed skating and figure skating), Valtellina (hosting freestyle skiing and snowboard events among others), Cortina (home of the women’s Alpine skiing and ice sports such as curling , skeleton and luge) and Val di Fiemme (where the ski jumping and cross-country skiing will take place).
How can I watch the Winter Olympics?
Viewers in the UK and Ireland will be able to watch more than 850 hours of action across every sport, venue and medal event on TNT Sports and streaming service discovery+.
Coverage starts from £3.99/month in the U.K and €4.99/month in Ireland on discovery+, with access to TNT Sports 2 and other live event feeds.
Live competition coverage will run from 9am to 10pm, with an hour-long studio show previewing the day’s events from 8am and an end-of-day round-up once live sporting action is complete.
Skeleton gold medallist Amy Williams, two-time Olympian and snowboarder Aimee Fuller, alpine skiers Ed Drake and Charlie Guest, bobsleigh pilot Lamin Deen and curling bronze medallist Vicki Chalmers will be among the commentary and punditry team.
Sky TV: access via TNT Sports on discovery+ dependent on subscription type. Sky TV customers can also activate discovery+ Entertainment at no extra cost to their current subscription, providing access to the full Olympics experience on discovery+
Virgin Media UK: watch on TNT Sports; Virgin Media Entertainment customers via two linear pop-up channels
Virgin Media Ireland: watch on TNT Sports
EE/BT: access via TNT Sports on discovery+ dependent on subscription type.
Amazon PVC: access via any discovery+ subscription.
Vodafone UK: Customers can access via discovery+ Entertainment subscription
Roku, Samsung, Amazon Fire TV, PlayStation, Apple TV+, Google TV, Xbox: access via any discovery+ subscription.
The BBC will also provide some coverage, with two streams of live daytime action: between 9am and 10pm each day on BBC One and BBC Two, and an Olympics Extra live stream on BBC iPlayer and BBC Sport from 8am to 11pm.
In total the BBC will broadcast 450 hours of live sport, with two-time skeleton Olympic champion Lizzy Yarnold, figure skating gold medallist Robin Cousins, curling gold medallist Vicky Wright, and former bobsledder Montell Douglas among those providing analysis.
Stellantis logo is pictured at one of its assembly plants following a company’s announcement saying it will pause production there, in Toluca, state of Mexico, Mexico April 4, 2025.
Henry Romero | Reuters
Shares of automaker Stellantis plunged 27% in European trading on Friday, after the company said it expects to take a 22-billion-euro ($26 billion) hit from a business reset and hinted at a pull-back from its electrification push.
By 12:57 p.m. in Milan, the company’s Italian shares were 27% lower. In premarket trading on Wall Street, the transatlantic firm’s New York-listed stock plummeted 26.5%.
Other French auto stocks also fell Friday morning, with Valeo and Forvia both down more than 1.2% and Renault sliding 2%.
“The charges announced today largely reflect the cost of over-estimating the pace of the energy transition that distanced us from many car buyers’ real-world needs, means and desires,” said Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa in a statement.
“They also reflect the impact of previous poor operational execution, the effects of which are being progressively addressed by our new Team.”
Going forward, Stellantis said it would remain at the forefront of EV development, but said its own electrification journey would continue at “a pace that needs to be governed by demand rather than command.”
Stellantis also pre-released some figures for the fourth quarter on Friday, saying it anticipates a net loss for 2025. In recognition of that net loss, it has suspended its dividend for 2026 and plans to raise up to 5 billion euros by issuing hybrid bonds.
For 2026, the auto giant is targeting a mid-single-digit percentage increase in net revenue and a low-single-digit increase in its adjusted operating income margin.
The company said its dividend pause and bond issuance would help preserve its balance sheet, and outlined the actions it had taken last year as part of its reset strategy.
These included announcing “the largest investment in Stellantis’ U.S. history” — totalling $13 billion over four years — as well as launching 10 new products, canceling products that could not achieve profit at scale, and restructuring its global manufacturing and quality management capabilities.
Under the U.S. investment drive, the transatlantic automaker has said it will add 5,000 jobs to its American workforce.
While these moves had resulted in costs of 22.2 billion euros, the company said they had collectively delivered a return to positive volume growth in 2025.
In the second half of the year, Stellantis’ U.S. market share rose to 7.9%, while the company said it retained its overall second-place market share position in the enlarged Europe.
Stellantis’ writedown follows multibillion-dollar hits at rivals Ford and GM, which recently announced their own hits worth $19.5 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively — both being related to EV pullbacks.
Given the “magnitude of the kitchen sinking” and the soft 2026 guidance, UBS analysts said the negative share-price reaction was expected. They added, however, that new management’s “decisive” clean-up and solid regional market fundamentals leave the stock attractive as a potential U.S. “comeback” play.
‘Year of execution’
Friday’s writedown announcement came alongside news that Stellantis will offload its stake in NextStar Energy, a joint venture with LG Energy Solution that built and operated a Canadian battery manufacturing facility. LG Energy Solution will take over Stellantis’ 49% stake, the firms said on Friday morning.
The joint venture was part of Stellantis’ broader electrification strategy. In 2022, former CEO Carlos Tavares set a goal for 100% of sales in Europe and 50% of sales in the U.S. to be battery electric vehicles by the end of the decade.
The company is set to present an updated long-term strategy at its Capital Markets Day in May.
Stellantis’ stock has been under pressure for some time, with its Italian shares slumping nearly 25% last year and 40.5% the previous year. Shares are currently down more than 13% since the beginning of 2026.
In a Friday note, Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said Stellantis had placed a “miscalculated bet” on electric vehicles – but said the broader picture on EV adoption raised questions about Stellantis’ marketability.
“The long-held argument about why many drivers won’t go electric yet are concerns about price, access to charging infrastructure, and how long a battery will last during their journey,” he said.
“However, prices are coming down, more chargers are being installed, and battery range is improving. The success of companies like BYD suggests there are plenty of people willing to take the leap. That begs the question as to whether Stellantis’ frustration over its EV sales is linked to market issues or that drivers simply don’t like its vehicles.”
Stellantis is scheduled to publish its 2025 earnings in full on Feb. 26.
Dear Eric: My mother is in her last months of life. She has been cared for in her home for the last three years by increasingly expensive home health care workers. I and other siblings have suggested over and over that she be put in a care home for round-the-clock care, but our oldest sibling (we’ll call them Jimmy) has steadfastly refused, saying nursing homes let people die and neglect patients and cause massive bedsores and all sorts of terrible over-the-top excuses.
Well, now that Jimmy’s own mother-in-law is going into a nursing home Jimmy has decided it’s time for our mother to go as well.
We have had family meetings where we decide as a sibling group how to care for our mother and then Jimmy goes against the group decision. Prior to the conflict over our mother’s care, I had a good, albeit not close, relationship with this sibling, but now I’m so frustrated by the selfish choices made regarding our mother’s care that I’m ready to say goodbye forever once mom is buried.
Should I let years of bullying in regard to caring for our mother be the cause to cut off contact with Jimmy?
— Frustrated Little Sister
Dear Sister: It’s really unfortunate that Jimmy is dealing with the stress, confusion, and grief of this phase of life by refusing to collaborate and resorting to, as you write, bullying behavior. Perhaps in his mind, he’s the one keeping the ship right. Perhaps he’s grasping after a version of life that’s no longer possible. I have empathy for him and for you, but the fact is that no matter his intentions, he’s caused harm in your relationship and that needs repair.
Don’t cut him off but do have a conversation with him about the way you’ve interacted in the past. There’s no need to rehash old conflicts, but it’s fine to say something like “I didn’t like being in conflict about mom’s care. I want us to have a different relationship going forward. How can we do that?”
Dear Eric: My husband and I moved to a new city last year and were eager to make friends. We became close to another couple, “Susan and Mike,” rather quickly and saw them often. I realized after several months however that, while I enjoyed Susan’s company, Mike is not someone I am comfortable with.
He is a heavy drinker and makes sexist and racist comments that leave me cringing. I’ve reached out to Susan several times to suggest the two of us do things solo, but unfortunately, they are quite joined at the hip.
She’s reached out a number of times over the past couple of months to ask about our next get together, and each time I pretended we had conflicts but didn’t suggest alternative dates. She reached out again today and I feel bad.
I can’t keep avoiding them, but I am not sure how to best put some distance between us without creating ill will. I feel that honestly isn’t the best policy here, but maybe I am just trying to avoid the inevitable.
— Uncoupling the Couple
Dear Couple: On Monday, I published a letter with a slightly similar issue and replied that, alas, you can’t divorce someone else’s husband. The same is true in your case. Moreover, I think it would be wise to accept what Susan is communicating to you. If she and Mike are a package deal, warts and all, it will probably help you to think of them that way.
I know that Susan’s presence is more tolerable to you than Mike’s — and, from what you’ve written, for good reason. But it doesn’t do you much good to think about how ideal your friendship would be if you could just get Susan away from him. Not going to happen. Indeed, if he’s saying racist and sexist things and you’re cringing, but she isn’t, Mike might not be the only one to hold those opinions.
I don’t mean to malign Susan’s character. And it’s not right to hold anyone responsible for their spouse’s actions, but it sounds like she’s thinking of this as a couple friendship. And so, the truth, for you, is that it doesn’t work. I find directness to be the best course when one friend keeps reaching out, difficult though it may sometimes be. The alternative — slowly drifting apart or escalating instances of ignoring — stands to create just as much ill will. Instead, consider telling the truth. “We like you and we’ve appreciated being friends with you, but it’s hard to take some of Mike’s comments, such as [X] and [Y].”
(Send questions to R. Eric Thomas at eric@askingeric.com or P.O. Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. Follow him on Instagram and sign up for his weekly newsletter at rericthomas.com.)
Toronto police knew it had a trust issue before seven serving officers were charged as part of an organized crime investigation.
A study completed by the police services board last year found public trust in the force was “strained,” with many concerned about misconduct and the uneven application of standards.
“From the public, we heard similar concerns about mistrust, systemic bias, and a lack of visible accountability,” part of a lengthy study found.
“Repeated incidents of misconduct and social media narratives reinforce skepticism, especially among youth and newcomer communities.”
Those concerns spiralled into a crisis on Thursday, when York Regional Police announced they had charged seven serving Toronto cops in a massive corruption and organized crime investigation.
The charges included allegedly leaking police information to an organized crime group that then carried out shootings, exortions and robberies. Other charges relate to alleged bribery.
Story continues below advertisement
Those charges have left police leadership in the difficult position of trying to explain and investigate what happened.
Global News crime analyst Hank Idsinga said the force had a lot of work left to rebuild already fragile public trust.
“I think you’ve got a lot of questions, I think you’ve got a lot of questions that haven’t been answered yet,” he said.
“Toronto, what the heck is going on down there? Especially if you take into consideration everything that has happened over the last few years in this city.”
Idsinga pointed out that, if the charges against the officers are proven, it could cast doubt on testimony they’d provided in other cases, potentially opening up a stream of appeals.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
“Maybe they’re involved in an armed robbery investigation from five or six years ago. And if they were a key witness to that armed robbery investigation and somebody was convicted and is doing jail time,” he said.
“I guarantee the defence lawyer from that case is going to look at that list of officers here involved and say, ‘Hold on a second, the credibility of this officer who was a key witness when my client was convicted is absolutely in question. I’m filing an appeal.’”
Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow told reporters Thursday she would meet with Toronto police Chief Myron Demkiw to resolve the issue.
Story continues below advertisement
During an event, the local police chief disavowed the accused officers, saying their alleged actions did not represent the service.
Related News
Several Toronto police officers arrested in organized crime investigation
“The allegations against these individuals do not represent the Toronto Police Service,” Demkiw said. “They do not represent who you are. They do not represent what our organization is and stands for.”
Ian Scott, the former director of the Special Investigations Unit, said police had taken a “big step” in announcing the arrests and accepting there was a problem.
“But to some degree they are fighting a bit of a rear-guard action,” he explained. “The misconduct and alleged criminal offences have taken place, and they’re trying to put Humpty Dumpty back together again.”
There are those who say neither Demkiw, nor the police services board, nor the mayor can lead any investigation into how seven Toronto police officers were allegedly corrupted.
Ontario Liberal MPP Karen McCrimmon said the charges had shattered confidence in Toronto police — leaving the force at a delicate crossroads.
“These are very, very serious charges and it really does strike at the heart of the relationship between the police and the constituents. That trust and that bond,” she told Global News.
“I think this is very, very dangerous.”
Story continues below advertisement
McCrimmon said the provincial government must order a judicial inquiry into Toronto police and the officers to rebuild trust. Any investigation that isn’t open to the public, she said, would fall short.
“It’s not as important for justice to be done if it’s not seen to be done; it has to be both. It has to be fully accountable to the people and they have to have trust in the process so it can’t be manipulated,” McCrimmon said.
“For a full judicial inquiry, you’re before a judge and lawyers, there are guardrails … you know that the outcome is real. It’s valid, it’s legitimate. Anything else done behind closed doors or done informally will not have that same credibility with people.”
A spokesperson for Ontario’s Solicitor General Michael Kerzner did not address questions and said only local police would answer them.
Premier Doug Ford appeared to brush off the suggestion, saying the investigation would be well-handled by local cops.
“The investigation is ongoing, so they’re going to continue their investigation,” he said on Wednesday. “I feel both chiefs are doing an incredible job, and they’re going to cross every ‘t’ and dot every ‘i.’”
Ford said the arrest of seven serving officers in a massive organized crime investigation should not shake public confidence.
Story continues below advertisement
“I don’t want to paint a broad brush or tarnish the police,” he said.
“We have phenomenal police officers … I don’t want the pubic to lose trust in our great trust, they are incredible. There’s always, (in) any organization, a few bad apples and the courts are going to decide.”
Labour MP says that Keir Starmer needs a “clearout” of advisers in No 10
Hello and welcome to Friday’s edition of our UK politics blog.
To start, I want to take you back to what feels like another era… July 2024.
Keir Starmer’s message to the British people during the last election cycle was pretty simple: Labour were the grown-ups in Parliament and were the only party who could be trusted to govern the country.
The campaign could be summed up in one persistently repeated sentence: “Only a Labour government can break this cycle and stop the chaos.”
And yet, once again, the prime minister has faced his worst week in office. Anger has continued to grow, with the party unable to stay on message. Labour MPs feel this latest incident is a problem of his own making, given he chose to appoint the so-called “Prince of Darkness” Peter Mandelson as US ambassador.
But his MPs are divided over how to move on. So far No 10 has held out calls to sack Starmer’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, who pushed for Mandelson’s appointment back in 2024.
That won’t stop the outrage though. Speaking on the Today programme, Labour MP Simon Opher said there needs to be a “clearout” of advisers in number 10, with a specific shout-out for McSweeney to leave.
“There’s a lot of anger amongst Labour MPs, because really we want to, I mean, yesterday, I want to be talking about the cancer care plan, not about Peter Mandelson,” he said.
“So I think what we need to do, I think what needs to really happen is that we need to, Keir Starmer needs to change his advisers in Number 10, I think he’s been badly advised, and he’s been really let down, particularly on this decision.
Pressed on whether this meant McSweeney should go, he said: “I think so yes”.
“If my chief of staff had done this I think he would be looking for another job to be honest.”
Key events
Ministers and government officials must submit all communications with Mandelson, ISC says
Parliament’s intelligence and security committee (ISC) has published a letter explaining how documents relating to Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador will be published.
A key requirement is that all communications between Mandelson and ministers, government officials and special advisers (such as Starmer’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney) must be published.
The ISC also laid out that the cabinet secretary should decide which documents should be made public with an expectation that this happens “very shortly.”
If there are any documents that could have implications for national security or international relations, then they should be handed over to the ISC, who will decide whether or not to publish them.
The one saving grace for Starmer is that no candidates have stepped forward to call him out – and many Labour MPs are waiting for that person to make the first move.
Even as a number of names have been put forward as candidates who could take the top job – such as Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting – none have issued a direct challenge so far. That’s causing frustration among some of the party’s newest MPs.
Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting Composite: Getty and PA
Speaking to my colleague Jessica Elgot, one MP said they had “contempt” for leadership contenders who had not taken their chance. “Sometimes in politics, it’s about leadership. We needed leadership.”
Another told her: “If you are not brave enough to be first out of the traps, you don’t deserve to be prime minister.”
Harriet Harman says Starmer looks “weak, naive and gullible” over Mandelson appointment
Number 10 clearly hoped that Starmer’s apology to Epstein’s victims on Thursday would help him regain the trust of the public and his MPs.
He said yesterday that the victims of Epstein had “lived with trauma that most of us could barely comprehend”, and added: “I want to say this. I am sorry – sorry for what was done to you, sorry that so many people with power failed, sorry for having believed Mandelson’s lies and appointed him, and sorry that even now you’re forced to watch this story unfold in public once again.”
His statement centered around the view that Mandelson lied to him about the depth of his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein after his conviction as a sex offender.
That apology hasn’t done what he wanted.
Instead, the criticism has continued from all corners of the party. One of the most stinging lines came from Harriet Harman, a sitting member in the Lords and a former deputy leader of the Labour party, who said the scandal made him look “weak, naive and gullible.”
In an interview with Sky News podcast Electoral Dysfunction, she said: “He’s got to stop blaming Mandelson and saying, ‘he lied to me’.
“Because actually he should never have been considering him in the first place. And to say ‘he lied to me’ makes it look weak and naive and gullible. So it’s just completely the wrong thing.”
The path forward, in her view, is a “full reset” of his advisers in No 10.
McSweeney staying would leave the prime minister’s position “untenable,” Labour MP says
Peter Walker
Downing Street has defied calls to remove Keir Starmer’s most senior aide, insisting Morgan McSweeney retains the prime minister’s confidence, as frustration grows over a wait for documents on Peter Mandelson, which some fear could last for weeks.
Amid warnings from Labour backbenchers that McSweeney’s survival would leave Starmer’s position “untenable”, Starmer apologised to victims of Jeffrey Epstein for appointing Mandelson, a close friend of the convicted child sex offender, as US ambassador.
A day after a chaotic Commons deal to release vetting papers over Mandelson’s appointment left many Labour MPs mutinous, there was still fury about the role of McSweeney, the PM’s chief of staff.
One Labour MP said: “People want [McSweeney] to go, more than ever before. The current situation is unsustainable.”
Karl Turner, the Hull East MP and a vocal critic of the current No 10 operation, said McSweeney staying would leave the prime minister’s position “untenable”. “I don’t want the PM to go. What I want is the PM to make changes,” he told the BBC.
Downing Street officials pointed to Starmer’s strong defence of McSweeney in the Commons on Wednesday, in which he said nothing had changed. Supporters of the PM are aware that shedding his chief of staff could leave Starmer more directly in the firing line in a future crisis.
Read the full story: No 10 defies calls to sack Morgan McSweeney over Mandelson appointment
Labour MP says that Keir Starmer needs a “clearout” of advisers in No 10
Hello and welcome to Friday’s edition of our UK politics blog.
To start, I want to take you back to what feels like another era… July 2024.
Keir Starmer’s message to the British people during the last election cycle was pretty simple: Labour were the grown-ups in Parliament and were the only party who could be trusted to govern the country.
The campaign could be summed up in one persistently repeated sentence: “Only a Labour government can break this cycle and stop the chaos.”
And yet, once again, the prime minister has faced his worst week in office. Anger has continued to grow, with the party unable to stay on message. Labour MPs feel this latest incident is a problem of his own making, given he chose to appoint the so-called “Prince of Darkness” Peter Mandelson as US ambassador.
But his MPs are divided over how to move on. So far No 10 has held out calls to sack Starmer’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, who pushed for Mandelson’s appointment back in 2024.
That won’t stop the outrage though. Speaking on the Today programme, Labour MP Simon Opher said there needs to be a “clearout” of advisers in number 10, with a specific shout-out for McSweeney to leave.
“There’s a lot of anger amongst Labour MPs, because really we want to, I mean, yesterday, I want to be talking about the cancer care plan, not about Peter Mandelson,” he said.
“So I think what we need to do, I think what needs to really happen is that we need to, Keir Starmer needs to change his advisers in Number 10, I think he’s been badly advised, and he’s been really let down, particularly on this decision.
Pressed on whether this meant McSweeney should go, he said: “I think so yes”.
“If my chief of staff had done this I think he would be looking for another job to be honest.”
Russia’s Putin being briefed on top general’s assassination attempt, Kremlin says
The Kremlin has just said that special services are looking into the attempted assassination reported this morning, and Russia’s president Vladimir Putin is being briefed on the incident, Reuters reported.
Key events
Alekseyev’s shooting will be seen as failure to protect key military personnel – snap analysis
Pjotr Sauer
Russian affairs reporter
Alekseyev’s shooting will be seen as the latest failure of Russia’s security services to protect key military personnel deep inside Russia.
While details of who carried out the attack and how it was organised remain unclear, Russian military bloggers have criticised apparent security lapses, questioning how a gunman was able to enter the apartment building undetected.
When Lt Gen Igor Kirillov, another prominent military official, was killed in December 2024 after an explosive device planted in a scooter detonated as he left his home in Moscow, Vladimir Putin described the killing as a “gravest failure” of Russia’s law enforcement agencies.
Russia’s Putin being briefed on top general’s assassination attempt, Kremlin says
The Kremlin has just said that special services are looking into the attempted assassination reported this morning, and Russia’s president Vladimir Putin is being briefed on the incident, Reuters reported.
‘Striking’ timing of the shooting prompts Russia to blame Ukraine – snap analysis
Pjotr Sauer
Russian affairs reporter
The timing of the shooting is striking. It came a day after Russian and Ukrainian delegations – including Alekseyev’s direct superior, Igor Kostyukov – met in Abu Dhabi, where both sides spoke of apparent progress in the peace talks.
Some in Moscow swiftly blamed Ukraine, alleging without evidence that Kyiv was attempting to derail the talks.
“An attempt on Alekseyev’s life is the best way to derail these talks, and the only person who stands to benefit in this situation is Volodymyr Zelenskyy,” said Alexei Zhuravlev, a Russian parliamentarian.
He called for those involved to be eliminated, describing Alekseyev as “one of the most authoritative and respected generals in the Russian army.”
Previous peace efforts have broken down over Russia’s maximalist territorial demands on Ukraine, with Moscow repeatedly rejecting Kyiv’s calls for an immediate ceasefire.
Russian news agency Interfax is reporting that the investigators are currently looking at CCTV recordings from the crime scene and interrogating eyewitnesses, with early reports that the attacker fired “several shots” at Alekseyev.
Moscow’s suspicions are likely to fall on Kyiv as attack on military chief investigated – snap analysis
Pjotr Sauer
Russian affairs reporter
Alekseyev is a deputy director of Russia’s military intelligence agency, the GRU. He has been widely described as a key figure overseeing the country’s private military companies and was among the senior officials dispatched to negotiate with Yevgeny Prigozhin during the Wagner group’s brief mutiny in the summer of 2023.
He is also under US sanctions for his alleged involvement in efforts to interfere in the 2020 presidential election.
No party has claimed responsibility for the attack, but suspicion in Moscow is likely to fall on Kyiv. Ukrainian intelligence agencies have targeted dozens of Russian military officers and Russian-installed officials since the start of the war, accusing them of involvement in war crimes.
Little is publicly known about the clandestine networks believed to be behind assassinations and attacks on military infrastructure inside Russia and in Russian-controlled territories.
Morning opening: Deputy chief of Russian military intelligence shot
Jakub Krupa
We are opening today’s live blog with breaking news coming to us from Moscow that a deputy chief of Russian military intelligence was shot and wounded Friday, officials said, in comments reported by AP.
Lt Gen Vladimir Alekseyev was shot several times by an unidentified assailant in Moscow, Investigative Committee spokesperson Svetlana Petrenko said in a statement.
She said that Alekseyev was hospitalised. Petrenko didn’t say who could be behind the attack Alekseyev has served as the first deputy head of Russia’s military intelligence since 2011.
AFP noted that several high-ranking military officials have been killed since Moscow launched its full-scale offensive on Ukraine in February 2022.
I will bring you more when we have it.
It’s Friday, 6 February 2026, it’s Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live.
President Donald Trump on Thursday unveiled his TrumpRx website in an event at the White House, listing 40 drugs at lower cost than previous list prices to patients paying out of pocket and calling the launch part of the “most transformative health care initiatives.”
Trump made the announcement alongside Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz and National Design Studio Director Joe Gebbia.
“Starting tonight, dozens of the most commonly used prescription drugs will be available at dramatic discounts for all consumers throughout a new website is called TrumpRx.gov,” Trump said at the White House event.
Some of the reduced cash prices were announced last year by the administration and some of the new prices had already gone into effect.
U.S. President Donald Trump listens as Dr. Mehmet Oz, Administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, speaks during an event to unveil the TrumpRx drug discount site, in the South Court Auditorium on the White House campus, in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 5, 2026.
Al Drago/Reuters
The president touted the use of his Most Favored Nation (MFN) policies — making sure the U.S. isn’t paying more than other countries — for making the lower prices possible.
“For years, politicians from both parties have promised to bring down prescription drug prices and make health care more affordable, but they all failed,” Trump said.
According to the TrumpRx website, these drugs can be obtained at participating pharmacies using coupon card codes displayed on the website or directly through manufacturers’ websites.
The website also notes that “TrumpRx discounted pricing is only available for cash-paying patients,” in a FAQ section. The discounts are not available for patients trying to pay through insurance and do not go toward insurance deductibles.
Only a few dozen drugs are offered on the website, though the website says that “many more drugs are coming soon,” in a FAQ section.
WASHINGTON, DC – FEBRUARY 5: Chief Design Officer of the National Design Studio Joe Gebbia speaks as Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Mehmet Oz looks on during an event on drug pricing in the South Court Auditorium on the White House campus on February 5, 2026 in Washington, DC. The president announced the launch of TrumpRX, which the White House said would help lower prescription drug prices.
Nathan Howard/Getty Images
What some experts are saying
“It’s nice that they are aggregating coupons in one place,” Benjamin Jolley, PharmD, a senior fellow for health care at the American Economic Liberties Project told ABC News. “But it’s a convenience to check the website to see the coupons all in one place for the first time.
Dr. Christina Madison, the founder of The Public Health Pharmacist told ABC News: “There are a lot of patient assistance programs out there and this appears similar to programs like GoodRX but the difference here is that you would not have to go through the manufacturer’s website to get them.”
In a statement, Good RX tells ABC News they are a key integration partner for pharma companies that is offering discounted cash prices on TrumpRX, “The self-pay price is hosted on the GoodRx platform and GoodRx then integrates the price into TrumpRx.”
GoodRX-provided codes can currently be used at over 70,000 retail an home delivery pharmacies.
How much will consumers save?
Trump said the discount offers “tremendous” savings.
But experts say the overall savings are not clear and may only benefit a certain group of people.
“TrumpRx’s offerings are very limited, fewer than 50 drugs listed,” Rena Conti, an associate professor at the Boston University Questrom School of Business, told ABC News.
US President Donald Trump (L) listens as the Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Mehmet Oz (C) and the chief design officer of the National Design Studio Joe Gebbia introduce the new TrumpRx website, in the South Court Auditorium of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 5, 2026. The TrumpRx.gov website will serve as a central hub to help consumers find discounted prescription drugs by directing them to drugmakers’ direct-to-consumer sites.
Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images
“This suggests it pays for consumers to check their insurance coverage and ask their regular doctor or pharmacist before they use this service,” Conti added.
The website boasted savings on GLP-1s, showing that the Wegovy pill’s lowest TrumpRx price was $149 a month, slashed from what the website says is an original price of $1,349. And while the full cash price of Ozempic and Wegovy (FDA approved for weight loss) did start at over $1,000 a month, those prices have been slowly going down in price. It was reduced voluntarily first to $499 in March 2025 and then to $199 in November after negotiations with the federal government.
Some drugs remain very expensive, including Xeljaz, which is marked at a starting price of $1,518, despite a 50% savings.
Fertility drugs
One of the big categories of drugs included in TrumpRx are fertility drugs.
According to the website, Gonal-F is available for an 83% discount, down from $966 to just $168 for the pen. Another IVF drug, Cetrotide, is offered at a 93% discount. And Ovidrel is offered for a 67% discount.
“One in three families is having trouble having a baby. We’re gonna have a lot of Trump babies with these costs, folks cannot afford these medications. It’s gonna change their lives,” Oz said during the White House event.
“The fertility drug discount is legitimately a big deal for people trying to get IVF,” Jolley said. “These medicines are quite expensive and this seems like a big discount. In general IVF is not covered by insurance and so people prior to this who needed certain drugs would be paying the full $1400 price.”
Jolley noted for example, that the price slash on certain fertility drugs could lower the cost of an IVF cycle by about 20% overall.
President Donald Trump attends the National Prayer Breakfast, Feb. 5, 2026, in Washington.
Evan Vucci/AP
Trump first revealed his administration’s goal of launching the website back in September when he announced that Pfizer had agreed to lower its prices for prescription drugs offered through Medicaid. Pfizer so far is the largest participant in Trump RX with over 30 medications listed.
Trump last month released his “Great Healthcare Plan,” in which he called on Congress to codify the “most favored nation” initiative.
The plan also proposed sending money directly to Americans to buy health insurance and included calls to increase price transparency and hold insurance companies accountable — though it largely lacked specifics.
Polls show most Americans are concerned about health care costs.
A survey last month from KFF, a nonprofit health policy research organization, found two-thirds of U.S. adults worried about being able to afford health care for them and their family — outranking other expenses like gas and groceries. A majority of Americans, 56%, said they expect health care to become less affordable in the coming year.
The poll also found that two-thirds of Americans said Congress “did the wrong thing” by allowing enhanced Affordable Care Act tax credits to expire. Millions of Americans were expected to face increased premium costs as a result of the lapse.
ABC News’ Eric Strauss, Michelle Stoddart, Emily Chang and Isabella Murray contributed to this report.
On Thursday’s broadcast of CNN International’s “The Brief,” Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) stated that he doesn’t think ICE officers should be setting up in or outside of schools.
Host Jim Sciutto asked, “Should there be parts of the community that should be off limits, though? For instance, you taught for Teach for America. When you were teaching, I imagine you wouldn’t want ICE officers coming up and setting up outside of schools, for instance.”
Kiley answered, “Yeah, there’s definitely no place for that in schools. I agree with you.”
Kiley also said that there needs to be better cooperation from states and localities with the federal government coupled with reforms, and he supports body cameras and more training.
U.S. forces carried out a lethal kinetic strike Thursday on a vessel allegedly operated by a designated terrorist organization, killing two suspected narco-terrorists.
U.S. Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM) said intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations.
Thursday’s strike marked the second U.S. strike this year. A previous strike also killed two suspected narco-terrorists and left one survivor, according to officials.
U.S. forces carried out a strike on a vessel in the Eastern Pacific on Thursday, according to U.S. Southern Command.(U.S. Southern Command)
U.S. Southern Command is responsible for military operations in Central and South America and the Caribbean, including counter-narcotics missions focused on disrupting drug trafficking networks that threaten U.S. interests.
The strike was carried out at the direction of U.S. Southern Command Commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan, who assumed command Thursday.
Donovan was sworn in during a ceremony at the Pentagon, succeeding acting commander U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Evan L. Pettus.
“Together with our partner nations, we will continue to address shared challenges, uphold democratic values, and ensure a safe and prosperous future for the region,” Donovan said in a statement.
U.S. Southern Command said U.S. forces conducted a strike on a vessel transiting known narco-trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific on Thursday.(U.S. Southern Command)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.